Max Nikulin writes:
> It is not necessary complex layout. It is a decoration similar to
> pictures in fiction books. Unlike figures such additions are not
> strictly important to understand material. In printed form it is like
> figures however. Insets are appropriate in particular places, but
>
Max Nikulin writes:
> * Topic 2
>some general notes
> *** Note 2.1...
> *** Note 2.2...
>[[#note_from_other_topic1]]
>contains some interesting details
This reminds me of org-transclusion.
Best,
Ihor
On 25/12/2021 03:17, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
It may have larger margins, smaller font, distinct font face,
another background color, box around or just rule at some side, so
readers have clear notion where it ends and main material continues.
This is complex layout, some
Max Nikulin writes:
> Text books and magazines may contain insets (side notes), sometimes
> even page-long ones. They present independent material that may be
> interesting or useful in particular context or may be just skipped
> when a reader is concentrated on main material. Such inset may be
>
On 24/12/2021 03:27, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
Robert Nikander writes:
I see why this is not possible, given the text format of an org file.
But I am curious if people think it would be useful.
While considered isolated, vim feature "set foldmethod=marker" with
explicit open and closed marke
Robert Nikander writes:
> I see why this is not possible, given the text format of an org file. But I
> am curious if people think it would be useful. This is a bit off-topic maybe,
> but I’m imagining what I would do if I created something like org-mode using
> another underlying format.
>
Robert Nikander writes:
> If you view a "*" item as "book section", it's confusing. But if you
> view a "*" item as "collapsible thing", then it makes more sense.
I understand your use case. But I think in that context Org headings
would still be useful (at least they remind us at what level we'r
You can also use drawers (as an alternative to inline tasks) for
collapsible content.
Another potential is to use blocks. You can define your own kind of blocks,
or even just use an org block and it is collapsible.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin (he/him/his)
Dohe
Max Nikulin wrote:
> Have you seen the following and links therein?
> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#closing-outline-sections
No, I hadn't found that. Thanks. Those links answer my question.
Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
> It is an interesting question; however, I would say that this is not a
Hi Robert,
Robert Nikander writes:
> I see why this is not possible, given the text format of an org file.
> But I am curious if people think it would be useful. This is a bit
> off-topic maybe, but I’m imagining what I would do if I created
> something like org-mode using another underlying form
On 23/12/2021 23:11, Robert Nikander wrote:
I see why this is not possible, given the text format of an org file.
But I am curious if people think it would be useful. This is a bit
off-topic maybe, but I’m imagining what I would do if I created
something like org-mode using another underlying for
I see why this is not possible, given the text format of an org file. But I am
curious if people think it would be useful. This is a bit off-topic maybe, but
I’m imagining what I would do if I created something like org-mode using
another underlying format.
Example:
* Top
Some text under “T
12 matches
Mail list logo
