Hi,
>
> We are currently trying to upgrade Apache1 to Apache2.
> In Apache1, we are using Apache::SSI with
>
> Can Embperl version 2 run under Apache 1.3.x or do I have to
> upgrade to Apache 2? Thanks!
>
Embperl 2 works under Apache 1.3 and Apache 2. You can use both.
Only on Windows only Apache 1.3 is supported yet.
Gerald
Hi,
>
> What is the timeframe for Embperl 2.0 final/gold/whatuwannacallit?
>
> If I didn't misunderstand, mod_perl 2 is finally final, so
> Embperl 2 has a chance to becoming same. Can you (well,
> Gerald, I believe) make a guesstimate about when it will be so?
>
The problem was that mod_per
Hi
>
> > do you have LoadModule embperl_module "/path/to/Embperl.so"
> in apache
> > config?
>
> Thanks for the advice.
>
> I did include it in the configuration file, but it is alas
> one of the files that SUSE decides to overwrite on startup.
> It wants to do some magic so I have to do so
Hi
> do you have LoadModule embperl_module "/path/to/Embperl.so" in apache
> config?
Thanks for the advice.
I did include it in the configuration file, but it is alas one of the files
that SUSE decides to overwrite on startup. It wants to do some magic so I
have to do some un-magic so it can
>
> > Alas, Novell doesn't include Embperl with its distribution. It does
> > however have Apache 2 and mod_perl 2. How dificult is it to get
> > Embperl 2 to run on top of that?
>
> SUSE 9.3 with apache2, apache2-devel. mod_perl 2 and either
> apache-prefork or apache-worker doesn't seem to l
Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
# make test
If I ignore the test and just make install, it sort of works. Strange thing is
that
EMBPERL_APPNAME freemoney
EMBPERL_OBJECT_BASE base.tepl
EMBPERL_URIMATCH "\.htm.?|\.epl$"
EMBPERL_SESSION_HANDLER_CLASS "no"
EMBPERL_FILESMATCH "\.htm.?|\.epl$"
> # make test
If I ignore the test and just make install, it sort of works. Strange thing is
that
EMBPERL_APPNAME freemoney
EMBPERL_OBJECT_BASE base.tepl
EMBPERL_URIMATCH "\.htm.?|\.epl$"
EMBPERL_SESSION_HANDLER_CLASS "no"
EMBPERL_FILESMATCH "\.htm.?|\.epl$"
results in a startup mess
> Alas, Novell doesn't include Embperl with its distribution. It does however
> have Apache 2 and mod_perl 2. How dificult is it to get Embperl 2 to run on
> top of that?
SUSE 9.3 with apache2, apache2-devel. mod_perl 2 and either apache-prefork or
apache-worker doesn't seem to like embperl:
con
Hi,
> after only just about three years of waiting, I now have Embperl 2
> up
> and running. I'm a bit slow, I know, but not that much - I misseed
> only about 7 betas of Embperl 2 ;-) (sorry, Gerald, I couldn't resist)
>
I should have made a new beta for every change, than you would surely miss
e when I get
enough time. Sorry.
Gerald
P.S. Please send furher questions to the Embperl mailing list, so others can
participate
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 7:54 AM
To: Pham Michael
Subject: Re: Embperl 2.xx
Hi,
sorr
At 12:40 PM -0500 11/1/02, Ilia Lobsanov wrote:
I'm attaching a file which demonstrates a bug in Embperl 2.0b8 -
2.0b9-dev3
When run via embpexec.pl, the html output contains '>' at the
end, which shouldn't be there.
I saw something similar recently and was about to report it when I
discovered
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:53:32AM +0200, Gerald Richter - ecos gmbh wrote:
> Apache::Session uses a hash function to select a semaphore out of a array.
> It may cause the the deadlock if both %udat and %mdat use the same one. If I
> have it right in mind per default we have 32 semaphores, to whic
>> [+ $mdat{cnt}++ +]
>>
>> Does it work or do you get the same problems?
>Ah, ok, that works. But the problem returns as soon as I have
>both udat and mdat in the page. Maybe it is Apache::Session or
>Apache::SessionX getting confused about having two session id's for
>one page and only one semap
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 06:52:45AM +0200, Gerald Richter wrote:
> Strange, %udat and %mdat are handled excatly the same, they just get a
> different session id.
>
> If you make a very simple page which just contains
>
> [+ $mdat{cnt}++ +]
>
> Does it work or do you get the same problems?
Ah, o
>>
>> Seems like a problem with semaphores inside of Apache::Session. You may
try
>> to remove the semaphore with ipcrm so it gets recreated (you can view it
>> with ipcs).
>
>Well, exactly that seems to be the case. As soon as I kill the
>semaphore with ipcrm the page is displayed correctly, even
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 06:36:02PM +0200, Gerald Richter wrote:
> > I have Apache::SessionX installed and
> > Embperl_Session_Config "File Semaphore"
>
> You don't need this when you have made it the default during
> Apache::SessionX Makefile.PL run
>
> > as the only session configuration option
> I got this to work nicely inside an epl file:
>
> Execute ({
> inputfile => 'test.xml',
> recipe => 'EmbperlXalanXSLT',
> xsltstylesheet => 'test.xsl'
> }) ;
>
> But what i really want to do is something like:
>
> 1) process my embperl file through embperl
> 2) process the
> The increasingly ubiquitous Java also can translate to
> cheaper in-house or out-sourced support for a product.
> What do you suppose the ratio of Java to Embperl
> programmers is? I don't think you can count the Perl
> CGI programmers out there as Embperl programmers since
> they must
>
> Gerald's response has me considering doing production
> sites in 2. I agree that Embperl is as good for some
> applications and even better for many. However, I
> need to sell my product and services. Java and XML
> are words everyone knows and associates with some kind
> of revolutionary a
> Then use Embperl and not Java. As far as I can see
> it there is
> only one reason to use JSP at all (at least if you
> know Perl
> already): If you have an existing Codebase from a
> standalone Java
> app and just want to change the GUI layer to
> something
> web-based. Ok, and maybe some inter
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:19:11PM -0800, Jarrod Stenberg wrote:
> use this to model, prototype and demo, then I'd build
> the sites in Java/JSP. Thing is, I move very slowly
> in Java.
Then use Embperl and not Java. As far as I can see it there is
only one reason to use JSP at all (at least if
>
> My plan is to quickly spit out a demo site for a
> potential client using this. My familiarity with perl
> will permit me to do this quickly. My thought was I'd
> use this to model, prototype and demo, then I'd build
> the sites in Java/JSP. Thing is, I move very slowly
> in Java. I'm temp
> Does Embperl 2 beta run on Apache 2.0 / mod_perl 2.0 (betas)?
>
Not yet.
Apache/mod_perl 2.0 has a different API and a different build system.
Embperl has to be adapted to that.
It's on the todo list
Gerald
-
Gerald Richtere
hi!
> i have discovered some bugs in Embperl
> (v2.0b2, downloaded from http://perl.apache.org/embperl)
>
> --
> bug #1
>
> the files in the .tar.gz archive doesn't have right permissions.
> Makefile.PL is not executable and hasn't the header #!/usr/bin/perl.
Makefile.PL is not supposed to
> > I guess this will be issue for Embperl 2, were it is very easy
> to define new
> > tags and their behaviour and which includes the possibility for
> switching
> > between different tag sets.
>
> Do you have a place where to see the planned features for Embperl
> 2? Some of
> the things you men
26 matches
Mail list logo
