On 12 November 2011 13:43, Michael Haberler wrote:
> you might consider switching to gladevcp for less dangerous results.
Ah, yes, now you mention it, that was the plan. I had just forgotten the plan.
--
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.
-
Gentle persons:
1. image file format
Taking a survey of the files in the 2.5 docs/src directory and below, I
find we have 368 image files in dxf, eps, gif, jpg, png, and ps format.
(Yes, I know some of the images appear in multiple formats, but that's
not the main issue here).
I think it is f
On 13 November 2011 16:19, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> However, I recommend that we restrict the production image files (e.g.,
> the files actually invoked in the asciidoc .txt files) to just two*
> formats---gif and png.
Why keep gif? png is effectively an updated .gif.
I would rather we kept eps an
On 11/13/2011 11:47 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 13 November 2011 16:19, Kent A. Reed wrote:
>
>> However, I recommend that we restrict the production image files (e.g.,
>> the files actually invoked in the asciidoc .txt files) to just two*
>> formats---gif and png.
> Why keep gif? png is effectively
On 13 November 2011 17:14, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> As a matter of personal prejudice, I think svg is better suited for
> vector graphics exchange than eps. We aren't exploiting the "vector"
> nature of the images in production, anyway.
I was mainly thinking of the equations in the pdf files (and I
Kent,
The guidelines I was working under was:
If the image was based on a dxf file retain that file so changes could
be made if needed in the future.
Use png images when possible (always use png was the actual guideline).
I have no idea what the guidelines for 2.5 is as it has been completely
c
>
> I'm happy to work on this, but I'm not until I get some assurance that
> all my work is not going to be tossed in the trash again.
>
> John
>
It seems to me the EMC board needs to create a clear path
for our doc issue.
I don't believe anyone is doing anything wrong, we just seem
to be g
On 11/13/2011 3:43 PM, John Thornton wrote:
> Kent,
>
> The guidelines I was working under was:
> If the image was based on a dxf file retain that file so changes could
> be made if needed in the future.
> Use png images when possible (always use png was the actual guideline).
>
> I have no idea wh
Chris Morley wrote:
> It seems to me the EMC board needs to create a clear path
> for our doc issue.
>
> I don't believe anyone is doing anything wrong, we just seem
> to be going an a few different directions with a lack of communication.
> Even when we try to communicate. :)
Yes, I strongly suppo
Kent A. Reed wrote:
>
> The first issue is the big one in my book. How should this material be
> organized? Should it be one humongous document? Many documents?
I think the size of the current docs DOES need several separate files,
as PDFs.
I don't think "many" is required, and maybe the current
On 11/13/2011 04:28 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> I had been working on a significant
> update to the docs for the Pico Systems boards, now the PDFs are not
> being built, so I have no idea how the PDF form of the asciidoc will
> look.
The pdfs *are* being built Jon, we went over this a week or two ago.
Hi
I do not know why but the file fr.po was almost entirely translated and
Stepconf is still English language.
Axis him, goes well in French.
Francis
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.
Feature Requests item #3437610, was opened at 2011-11-13 20:10
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by pmtool
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=356744&aid=3437610&group_id=6744
Please note that this message will contain a full cop
Feature Requests item #3437610, was opened at 2011-11-13 20:10
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by pmtool
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=356744&aid=3437610&group_id=6744
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of t
Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 11/13/2011 04:28 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>
>> I had been working on a significant
>> update to the docs for the Pico Systems boards, now the PDFs are not
>> being built, so I have no idea how the PDF form of the asciidoc will
>> look.
>>
>
> The pdfs *are* being
15 matches
Mail list logo
