Hi Ebo,
the announcement was done on the emc users list.
For you (and probably others) who are subscribed only to the developers
list, here is a link:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.emc.user/32195
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "EBo"
To:
Sent: Wednesday,
Alex I'm sure he meant discussion before the decision was made :)
This is the first I have ever heard of any problems with out name.
Chris M
> From: alex.j...@robcon.ro
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:59 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Rebranding E
>I was just going to do some LinuxCNC renaming in the Wiki.
> I find the entire wiki seems to be set to read-only.
If it's read-only, then you are not signed in.
See: http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BasicSteps
Looking at that page (and especially the diff to the previous version):
http:/
The link I sent describes some of the questions EBo had (why it is
necessary, etc)
As of the discussion, trust me - nothing would have been nicer than to let
someone else (even the community) handle it.
Unfortunately the board was approached. and by the current bylaws the same
board was requir
Ick... Oh well, it looks like Fred Proctor published the first paper
in 1993, and emc.com incorporated in 1994... At least they were nice
about it so it sounds like. To bad we could not skip 2 and move on to 3
;-) Actually them copyrighting/trademarking what is in essence
Einstein's equatio
On 1/18/2012 6:42 AM, EBo wrote:
Ick... Oh well, it looks like Fred Proctor published the first paper
in 1993, and emc.com incorporated in 1994... At least they were nice
about it so it sounds like. To bad we could not skip 2 and move on to 3
;-) Actually them copyrighting/trademarking what i
Obviously no one wants to get involved in a legal struggle, but I hope
that the board passed this by a competent lawyer. I have three in my
family - one who is chief counsel to a very large data services company
not related to EMC.
He might be willing to take a look at it - no charge.I know
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:20:01 -0500, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 6:42 AM, EBo wrote:
>> Ick... Oh well, it looks like Fred Proctor published the first
>> paper
>> in 1993, and emc.com incorporated in 1994... At least they were
>> nice
>> about it so it sounds like. To bad we could not sk
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:27:41 -0600
EBo wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:20:01 -0500, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> > On 1/18/2012 6:42 AM, EBo wrote:
> >> Ick... Oh well, it looks like Fred Proctor published the first
> >> paper
> >> in 1993, and emc.com incorporated in 1994... At least they were
> >>
EMCnc or EMCNC
for Enhanced Machine Computer Numerical Control
Ken
On 1/18/2012 11:32 AM, dave wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:27:41 -0600
> EBo wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:20:01 -0500, Kent A. Reed wrote:
>>> On 1/18/2012 6:42 AM, EBo wrote:
Ick... Oh well, it looks like Fred Proc
Actually, I do not see why a link on the front page saying "if you are
looking for emc.com -- the computer people... go here" But WHO am I
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:55:04 -0500, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> EMCnc or EMCNC
>
> for Enhanced Machine Computer Numerical Control
>
> Ken
>
> On 1/18/2012 11:32
Alex Joni wrote:
>> I was just going to do some LinuxCNC renaming in the Wiki.
>> I find the entire wiki seems to be set to read-only.
>>
>
> If it's read-only, then you are not signed in.
> See: http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BasicSteps
>
OK, apparently one needs to reset their p
Gentle persons:
I just edited the Wiki home page, wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl, to
get of the irritating spurious "?" marks (e.g., the Wiki's indication of
a missing link) introduced by the substitution of "LinuxCNC", which is a
WikiWiki word, and displays as "LinuxCNC?". In the process, I
Hi, I added a png of my vismach realization into the vismach page here:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Vismach
I wish i did the right thing.
BTW, I wrote LinuxCNC, and the result (as said) is 'LinuxCNC?'.
do I have to change into LinuxCNC, right?
--
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:19:26PM +0100, Spiderdab wrote:
> Hi, I added a png of my vismach realization into the vismach page here:
> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Vismach
> I wish i did the right thing.
>
> BTW, I wrote LinuxCNC, and the result (as said) is 'LinuxCNC?'.
>
> do I have
got it thanks
sorry did not try sooner
if u do a G84 with no spindle commanded u get
K word with no G2, G3, G33, G33.1, G76, G84 or G87 to use it
maybe error would be better as
Spindle not turning in G84
see how G33.1 reports spindle not turning in G33.1 if MDI with no
commanded speed
also it
Jon Elson wrote:
> I was just going to do some LinuxCNC renaming in the Wiki.
> I find the entire wiki seems to be set to read-only.
> Also, a number of pags are still missing.
> Table of Contents / Getting started:
> LinuxCNC Supported Hardware
> LinuxCNC Installing Linux
> LinuxCNC pure simulator
17 matches
Mail list logo
