On Mar 9 2013 9:26 PM, John Morris wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 06:22 AM, Matt Shaver wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Matt Shaver
>> wrote:
>> To be clear: you can use libzmq (and any other 0MQ project with the
>> same license) in a GPLv2 project, both as a dynamic library, and in
>> a
>> st
On 03/09/2013 10:26 PM, John Morris wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 06:22 AM, Matt Shaver wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Matt Shaver wrote:
>> To be clear: you can use libzmq (and any other 0MQ project with the
>> same license) in a GPLv2 project, both as a dynamic library, and in a
>> static li
On 03/09/2013 06:22 AM, Matt Shaver wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Matt Shaver wrote:
> To be clear: you can use libzmq (and any other 0MQ project with the
> same license) in a GPLv2 project, both as a dynamic library, and in a
> static link. If you make patches, you need to publish them
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:23:04PM -0500, Matt Shaver wrote:
> At some point, Fred added the "GPLv2 and other rights" phrase to some
> or all of the files (I'll go back and research this fully). He told me
> (on the phone I guess, I can't find an e-mail) that "other rights" meant
> "also it's Pub
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:19:31 -0500
John Kasunich wrote:
> If at any point a chunk of code was public domain, it seems to
> me that the authors as of that point in time gave up all rights
> to it, including the right to object to re-licensing. I would say
> we only need to contact those people w
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:06:28 +0100
Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> I vaguely remember the question, it was from Michael Haberler on IRC,
> but I seem to remember there was more to it than just calling the
> library, and I don't have the IRC logs to check.
>
> To be clear: you can use libzmq (and any oth
Matt,
Am 09.03.2013 um 13:22 schrieb Matt Shaver:
> The Official Response:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Matt Shaver wrote:
>
>> "I have asked the ZeroMQ steward, Pieter Hintjens, wrt to
>> compatibility of a GPL2only project
The Official Response:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Matt Shaver wrote:
> "I have asked the ZeroMQ steward, Pieter Hintjens, wrt to
> compatibility of a GPL2only project and ZMQ, and his answer was a
> straight 'no'. Maybe I didnt as
