On January 6, 1997 Bob Johnson wrote:
>Does anyone know any reason why the IEC 320 C-14 connector style cannot
>be used for DC power? Specifically, we have an application for primary
>power entry in the 48-70 Vdc range, typical of telecom applications, and
>I see no clear reason for r
emc-pstc newsgroup
cc: Robert Johnson
RO>From: Robert Johnson
RO>Does anyone know any reason why the IEC 320 C-14 connector style cannot
RO>be used for DC power? Specifically, we have an application for primary
RO>power entry in the 48-70 Vdc range, typical of telecom applications, and
RO>I se
Hello Robert,
IEC 320 inlets cannot be used for DC power because of the chance that they
will be plugged into AC power by mistake. The general public does not
always read input labels and if they see an IEC 320 inlet there is an
automatic assumption that it plugs into AC. Most safety standards p
On Sun, 5 Jan 1997, Robert Johnson wrote:
> Does anyone know any reason why the IEC 320 C-14 connector style cannot
> be used for DC power? Specifically, we have an application for primary
> power entry in the 48-70 Vdc range, typical of telecom applications, and
> I see no clear reason for redesi
Dear Compliance Collegues
CFR47 sets emission limits for digital devices. As far as I know
there is or there was an exemption for machine controls, i.e. there
are no emission limits for industrial machines ( I am not referring to
ISM as defined by 47CFR18)
I can not find this exemption in the
The European standard is EN60825-1. All requirements, tests, and
markings are listed. Under the Low Voltage Directive, the
manufacturer/importer can self-decare compliance.
--
From: richa...@exabyte.com
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Laser product information
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.
Let me see if I understand this correctly..
The FCC in an attempt to speed up the Class B cert process introduced the
DoC process.
Can Class A equipment use the same process?
--( Forwarded letter 1 follows )-
X-Router: (TAO/SMTP Gateway 1.1.34)
Receiv
Hi all. I have a question to pose regarding UL and labelling requirements.
My company produces a number of ITE products which all use the same compliance
label with customizations specific to each product (model name, electrical
ratings, etc.). These customizations are imprinted on a generic label
Item Subject: Laser product information
Hello Richard,
The CDRH has a faxback system that can automatically fax you the CDRH
documents you are looking for. The faxback number is 800-899-0381 and
only works in North America.
Regards,
Ron
well...@corp
This is just a reminder to those who need reminding or just missed it the
first time. Thanks.
***
Colorado Product Safety Technical Committee (CPSTC)
Month of January 1997 Meeting Notice
The next meeting of the Colorado Product
Greetings Richard,
In (Sept) 1995 the FDA revised the " Guide for Preparing Annual Reports on
Safety Testing of Laser and Laser Light Show Products. And issued
amendments to the regulations.
For updated info, contact the FDA CDRH at (phone) 301-443-6597 or (Fax)
301-443-8818.
Their mailing
For REALLY low cost test equipment for use during the developmental stage,
refer to Dr. Keenan's book " Digital Design for Interference Specification"
Section 6.3.
This is something one can build himself, uses a dipole made of 300 ohm TV
antenna, an FM radio as the receiver, a signal generator,
> Date: 05 Jan 97 20:35:39 EST
Hi Cortland.
You wrote:
> Don't you agree it is fair to have one set of laws for everyone?
>
> Don't you agree we should be able to listen to radio even if the neigbhor
> turns
> on his computer?
>
Here my natural cynicism comes out...
Don't lose sig
13 matches
Mail list logo
