Hello Tony,
EN 414 is titled Safety of Machinery; rules for the drafting and
presentation of safety standards. It does not deal with risk assessment of
a machine. For risk assessment, try prEN 1050 Safety of machinery -
Principles for risk assessment or prEN 954-1 Safety of machinery - Safety
You can order it from ANSI (212) 642-4900
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: EN414 RISK ANALYSIS FORM IN ENGLISH
Author: Non-HP-owner-emc-pstc (owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org) at
HP-Boise,mimegw2
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 07:24:01 -0800
Paul Rampelbergh rampelberg...@infoboard.be wrote:
4. It seems there is'nt a problem to construct Log-periodic antenna's.
Construction data is available.
Do not require special items as ballun's, etc.
It seems more difficult to have data
Dear Hans,
I know of no manufacturers actually engaged in series production audits.
So lets hear from them. Please respond to this forum.
The companies I work with look to CISPR 22 8.2.1.1 and test one sample.
Some of them are happy with 0dB margin. I advise a higher margin, but
they are
Jon et al,
I helped to implement production audits per CISPR 16 @ Sun Microsystems
back in 1989. When I left in 1995, they had discontinued doing the audits
for ongoing production, but were still doing 5 unit audits on pilot samples.
I am not sure if they do it any longer. I felt that the
Hi Steve/Jon,
If you consider the test units as Work In Process (WIP), you
create an mfg inventory location for the test site, and consider this
an extension of the manufacturing process as Post Pack Audit, you
can consider the additional units as new and sell them as such.
Many companies have a
6 matches
Mail list logo
