I have an Information Technology device that intentionally generates and
uses 2.45 GHz signals. EN55022 does not provide limits above 1 GHz. Is there
another harmonized EN that can be applied for spurious emissions above 1
GHz? If not, will this product have to be submitted to a Competent Body?
Group,
I've got two general questions regarding hazardous material:
1). Any experience with identifying materials defined as hazardous by the
EPA? (Is there a list somewhere??) My customer is interested in steps that
should be taken to:
* Avoid exposure
* Avoid injury
* Proper disposal
Allen,
We have used a biconilog for radiated emissions testing in our 3m
semi-anechoic chamber for the past three years. We have done extensive
correlation studies to the biconicals we own and found there to be little
issue with using the biconilog. Its well balanced and therefore, we're not
All,
I didn't get out a tape measure, but I believe a bilog antenna
is taller than a bicon antenna in the vertical polarity,
and would be closer to the floor at the minimum antenna height
of 1 m (for most test procedures.)
For that reason, I believe there would be more coupling to
the ground
Thanks for your response. Since our lab will be used for pre-compliance in
an RD facility, I foresee several engineers wanting to use the equipment.
I would hate to see someone drop an antenna or knock one off the wall that
isn't being used. I didn't think of the scenario you mentioned where an
Allen,
I would like to clarify one point. I use a biconilog in the chamber. All
chamber work is rough or ballpark.
I use a biconical and a log periodic on the OATS.
There are a few articles around that identify repeatability issues with a
biconilog. However, for pre-compliance biconilog
Gary,
My firm makes video-phone related products. Each has a
basic rate ISDN interface. Traditionally, for the EEC
we have tested to ETSI specs TBR3 (network signalling)
and TBR8 (audio). Since April this year, we have been
able to use existing approvals and self declare for
the new kit, but we
Mr. Allen,
I have had some experience with biconilog, log periodic, and biconical
antennas for both emissions and immunity testing. I never had any
issues with the biconilog when used for immunity testing. However,
after using the biconilog for emissions testing on a 3 meter OATS, I
went back
Allen,
We have a similar chamber with similar issues. We use the immunity chamber
as a precompliance emissions chamber also. It's a lot of work to remove the
tiles from the floor so we left them in place for precompliance emissions
investigations. We use a biconilog antenna for both emissions
For emissions testing, the antenna should have a well balanced design when
used over a ground plane. Perhaps the antenna you are considering is not
well balanced. The balance issue shows up in the vertical orientation when
there is coupling to the ground plane and is not unusual in some bicons. I
Hello Group,
Does any of you know of a web location where I might get the 11 language
translations of the proposed manual statement (Hereby, [Name of
manufacturer], declares that this [type of
equipment] is in compliance with the essential requirements and other
relevant provisions of Directive
Morning Geoff,
The copper interface has been my only point, and the USB phone
doesn't have it. I agree and said, in an apparently round-about method, the
part that really is phone-like has to operate like a phone, including
billing, acoustic, tear-down and set-up as you mention below. No
Greetings,
I am having a fully anechoic pre-compliance test chamber built. By fully
anechoic, I mean ferrite tiles will be installed on the floor as well as the
walls and ceiling. The inner dimensions of the chamber will be 24 feet long
by 14 feet wide by 13 feet high. The chamber will be
Dear List,
I've received word of an Edition 2 for IEC 61010-1 which was recently
approved in a vote within the IEC. Does anyone have any information on when
or if this will be published by the EC (a DOP), or when an ultimate DOW
might be set?
Many thanks,
Paul O'Shaughnessy
Affymetrix,
To any that might know,
I have just heard that CENELEC has launched a formal vote on prEN 61312-1,
Protection Against
Lightning Electromagnetic Impulse: General Principles.
Does anyone have a copy of this document that you can share? Please advise.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
Hi,
I am currently researching the appropriate standards (UL, CSA, IEC) for a
position indicator. The indicator is mounted on a valve. It indicates
whether the valve is open or closed. It is a 10 to 30 Vdc, 150 mA, PNP
device. The valve is used in the pharmaceutical industry and controls the
Hello group,
Those of you who are want a official PDF copy of the latest SLIM Draft may
download it from:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/electr_equipment/emc/slim/review.htm
Best regards
Helge Knudsen
Delta
Electronics Testing, EMC
Venlighedsvej 4, DK-2970 Hoersholm
Telephone : +45 45
Shah,
The regulating or testing agency is Telec(see link below). I don't know
what the name of the standard is, but I know you can buy it from Telec. To
my knowledge, it is only printed in Japanese. I am not sure if they offer
an electronic copy or not.
Although not required, it sure makes
Gary,
Your comment is a valid one at the copper interface.
However, the telephone call set-up, content and tear-down
have also to be considered. There is a trend with PC modem
cards, to transfer most of intelligence back to the host CPU.
There is now software that will permit the PC user, via a
19 matches
Mail list logo