If you are just looking for something to help you create and manage the
file, there is available from Hyperlynx (now part of Inovada) a free IBIS
visual editor. This editor includes viewers for I-V and V-T tables, an
embedded golden parser, and an IBIS context sensitive editor. Go to:
Look for unattached individuals in hard labor camps... :-)
gjb
-Original Message-
From: Mike Devita [SMTP:md...@amkor.com]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 1:02 PM
To: emc-pstc; si-list
Subject: [SI-LIST] : IBIS modelers
Hi and happy Friday to all,
Does anyone know of
This month's meeting of Santa Clara Valley Chapter of the IEEE EMC Society
will be held at
SGI in Mountain View
on Tuesday 12 December at 7:00 PM.
The Chapter's newsletter Spectral Lines is attached to this email, together
with a map with the location of the meeting place.
The speaker at the
Hi and happy Friday to all,
Does anyone know of a good resource to get IBIS model editors/creators that are
low cost?
Thanks in advance!
To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
majord...@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or
ANSI/IEEE C95.1 is for human exposure but it does not cover pacemakers.
Draft VDE0848 part 2 (1991) covers 30 kHz-300Ghz and does have limits for
pacemakers. An English translation is available from BSI.
There is no relationship between the limits for human exposure and limits
for pacemakers.
Hi folks,
not long ago, there was some descussion on modules for passive power factor
correction. We have an application of around 150 watts that is a borderline
fail, and the addition of a small module would get us by until a new PS design
is developed from scratch.
Can anyone suggest
IEC529, section 10, Marking, says The requirements for marking shall be
specified in the relevant product standard.
Richard Woods
--
From: Robert Legg [SMTP:rl...@tectrol.com]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 10:50 AM
To: EMCPSTC
Subject: Labelling for EN 60529 Degrees of protection
What is the ANSI standard or regulation for safe limits for people
exposed to electromagnetic fields? How about people with pacemakers?
I've been informed that there may have been a German study done in
1988 concluding that these field limit values could be used in
Group,
Is anyone aware of labelling requirements for an enclosure tested to IPX-4?
Must this rating be listed on the label?
If so, is there letter size/shape legibility/indellibility attached to this
requirement.
Rob Legg
Tectrol Inc.
rl...@tectrol.com
Hi Stig,
One of my side jobs is in the Army National Guard Field Artillery. We
perform a risk assessment at each firing point we pull into using an Army
manual, FM 100-14 (Risk Management). I was surprised to see how closely
their documentation parallels EN 1050 in many aspects.
Here's a
Hi All,
For those of you who like to tinker in the lab (and
sometimes we have to when the right equipment is not
available), this month's Technical Tidbit (at
http://www.dsmith.org near bottom of index page) describes
how to make a shielded magnetic probe out of common
materials
(no semi-rigid
This is also the Risk Assessment matrix that all military services and several
other government agencies used in program/product development.
It is included in Mil-Std-882D, DOD Standard Practice for System Safety -
released February 2000.
System Safety is generally the equivalent to Product
John,
As far as I can see the standard EN50116 is NOT a listed standard
against the LVD or Machinery Directive.
Tony Reynolds
Pitney Bowes
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: RE: International Equivalent
As a member of the British EPL/74 committee, I can say that I
know of no plans to issue an IEC standard equivalent to EN50116.
Historically, almost certainly ECMA will have produced their standard
and then given it to CENELEC who issued it as EN50116.
I don't know if IEC would entertain
You are all invited to our next IEEE EMC Chicago Chapter meeting.
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wednesday December 13, 2000
Time: 7:30 pm
Location:Lindgren RF Enclosures (ETS-Lindgren)
400 High Grove Blvd, Glendale Heights, IL
Hi folks
IEC/EN60950: 2000 Clause 5.2.2 Note 1 refers to routine electric strength
tests of 1 second duration being permissable.
There is also the following ECMA std which says pretty much as EN50116:
ECMA-166 Information Technology Equipment - Routine Electrical Safety
Testing in Production
A colleague asked if I knew about the EMC 4343-95 specification. I'd
never heard of it.
Has anyone out there heard of it and if so, what is it and from where
did it come.
Dave Tarnowski
Whirlpool
Corp.
---
This
Deep within a very interesting paper on EMC and Functional Safety by the
IEE at
http://www.iee.org.uk/PAB/EMC/core.htm
in section 13.5 (page 49 on my copy) are pretty classic descriptions of
probability and severity. These probably are descendents of MILSTD1442, and
are probably also treated
Does anyone have an official document or know where such a document can be
obtained that details the European Unions requirement for treatment of
coniferous wood packaging materials and includes the required
implementation date?
All responses are appreciated.
Regards
Joe Martin
Applied
Is this 75 watts limit apply to class D products as well as class A ?
Reply Separator
Subject:Re: EN 61000-3-3 listing on a DoC.
Author: rehel...@mmm.com
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: 12/7/00 5:31 AM
Good
20 matches
Mail list logo
