I'll be the one with the white carnation..
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
neve...@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:41 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Boston Symposium
Group,
I'm just curious to know if th
Unfortunately I can't be there, but if on the way to get a brew you stop by a
post office or other federal building you may be able to see my picture
hanging up - but I didn't do all of the things they say, and even some of
those that I did do were more of a misunderstanding kind of thing. :)
Neven,
Boston is the home of Sam Adams beer. Check the web site
http://www.samadams.com/beer/tour.html
See you there?
Boris Shusterman, EMC Corp.
From: neve...@comcast.net [mailto:neve...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:41 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Boston Symp
I read in !emc-pstc that simon_...@emc.com wrote (in <277DD60FB639D511AC
0400b0d068b71e0c606...@corpmx14.us.dg.com>) about 'Russian Translation
for Battery Disposal Marking' on Thu, 24 Jul 2003:
>I would strongly advise you against this translator - I tried and the
>translation was really poor an
Hm...Neven, if you like, we can have a digital camera at Booth 209 at
the Symposium - anyone who would like their face captured for posterity can
drop in for a mug shot :)) Maybe our upcoming new website can have a link
to these, if desired by the capturees...
Cheers,
Kate
Kathy M. MacLe
I would strongly advise you against this translator - I tried and the
translation was really poor and grammatically incorrect.
I will try to do it for you later from home, where I have a Russian keyboard,
and will post for everybody on the list. However, to read it you will need to
have Russian
Group,
I'm just curious to know if the Boston EMC Symposium would be a good
opportunity to connect the email IDs with the faces. We might try to fill some
pub or brewery, if anyone is intereted :)
If there is enough interest, and if someone is familiar with the place (I am
not), he/she may ju
I read in !emc-pstc that rehel...@mmm.com wrote (in
)
about 'Generic industrial EMC standards' on Thu, 24 Jul 2003:
>There may be something in the fact that 61000-6-4 is an IEC generated
>document and the 50081-2 is a CENELEC generated document that never had
>an IEC equivalent.
Only insofar a
I read in !emc-pstc that Provost, Norm wrote (in
)
about 'NEW EMC Standards' on Thu, 24 Jul 2003:
>Responding to Ian Unwin's question regarding future direction of IEC
>61326, the proposal within IEC at the moment for the radiated-rf
>immunity test is 10 V/m (80 MHz-1 GHz), 3 V/m (1,4 GHz-2 GH
I read in !emc-pstc that iun...@servomex.com wrote (in ) about 'NEW EMC Standards' on
Thu, 24 Jul 2003:
>I am on the point of specifying a new signal generator for in-house
>radiated immunity testing. Does anybody out there have a feel for where
>the upper test frequency limit is likely to go fo
> From: Arthur Michael [mailto:amich...@safetylink.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:28 PM
>
> Patience, Little Grasshoppre, Patience.
What follows is my opinion. Yours might be different.
You misinterpret my meaning, Art, though I was a bit vague.
My "pleas for a response" were a
Ian,
IEC 60825-1 Edition 1.2 is likely the current standard regarding safety and
classification of both
laser and LED products. LED's were introduced several years ago with much
debate within TC76,
and the two light sources are now used interchangeably within this standard.
John A. Jankowski
Marko, in the past I used http://www.cris.com/~kropla/electric.htm and
http://www.getnet.com/~davidh/voltage.html, but they are no longer active.
Try http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/machinery/ecabroad.html, and have a look at
the bottom of the page for voltage tolerance by country. Try also
http://www.k
Responding to Ian Unwin's question regarding future direction of IEC 61326,
the proposal within IEC at the moment for the radiated-rf immunity test is
10 V/m (80 MHz-1 GHz), 3 V/m (1,4 GHz-2 GHZ), 1 V/M (2,0-2,7 GHz). Note
that these are the proposed industrial environment limits (currently Anne
The latest edition of the medical device standard requires testing to 2.5
GHz, and work is progressing on the requirement to test other equipment to 2
GHz. This is to cover the 1.89GHz cell phones, and in the possibly in the
future the 2.4 GHz band.
If you have the option the purchase of a genera
Hello Ian,
You have nothing to worry about in the United States. LEDs are not
considered laser devices in the USA. However, depending on who the
manufacturer of the LEDs is, I would verify with them what information they
have available on standards compliance with their LEDs.
Best regards,
Ro
_
Original Message dated 24/07/2003, 09:08:38
Author: "McBurney, Ian [Allen & Heath UK]"
Re: LED lamps:
_
Dear Group;
My company is in the process of designing a low voltage gooseneck lamp using
super bright white LEDs. I have been informed that LEDs are now classed as
la
Dear Group
I am on the point of specifying a new signal generator for in-house
radiated immunity testing. Does anybody out there have a feel for where the
upper test frequency limit is likely to go for industrial instruments
covered by EN 61326 and similar? Is it likely to remain at 1 GHz, or is
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Peter
I hope this helps:
"
Warning There is the danger of explosion if the battery is replaced
incorrectly. Replace the battery only with the same or equivalent type
recommended by the manufacturer. Dispose of used batteries according to the
manufa
>> Original Message <<
On 23/07/2003, 22:00:46, wrote regarding AC
Power variation standard:
> Hello,
> A little off-topic perhaps but ...
> I am currently writing an internal Hardware Quality Assurance standard
and would like to find a reference standard
Ian,
BS EN 60825-1 covers both lasers and LEDs.
regards
Regards,
Dave Coleman
Product Compliance Officer
RACAL Instruments Group Ltd.
29-31 Cobham Road
Ferndown Industrial Estate
Wimborne, Dorset
BH21 7PF, UK
From: McBurney, Ian [Allen & Heath UK] [mailto:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
There may be something in the fact that 61000-6-4 is an IEC generated
document and the 50081-2 is a CENELEC generated document that never had an
IEC equivalent.
Bob Heller
3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651- 778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
==
Peter
Try this site for Russian translation:
http://www.translate.ru/text.asp?lang=en
Stuart Miller
Ablewisp – compliance engineers
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of peter merguerian
Sent: 24 July 2003 01:07
To: emc-p...@majordomo.
Hello all,
In a similar vein, users of the 301 489 family should be aware that the
DOCOPOCOSS of 301 489-1 v1.2.1 passed on 30th June. v1.2.1 has RF immunity
requirements to 1GHz only; subsequent versions have an extended requirement
up to 2GHz.
Best regards,
Dave Graham
From: owner-emc-p...@m
***LEGAL DISCLAIMER: READ THIS FIRST***
This Email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom or the entity to which they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender
immediately. Please note that
25 matches
Mail list logo
