Dear Doug,
AFAIK, If the product type is not listed in CCC List. CCC Mark is not
required. This is the mandatory requirement.
If I understand you correctly, you mean if it is not tested, you may feel
uncertain whether it will get into trouble in China. If this is the case,
you may apply for
I read in !emc-pstc that Jan Heffken jheff...@core.com wrote (in
200402121954.i1cjse5q088...@mail5.mx.voyager.net) about '' on Thu, 12
Feb 2004:
After reading section FCC section 15.247, I have the following question.
Paragraph (b)(4)(ii) states:
(ii) Systems operating in the 5725-5850 MHz band
I read in !emc-pstc that POWELL, DOUG doug.pow...@aei.com wrote (in
970a8fe5db2be64eb6eab84087dcc1c818b...@bssexc01.aei.com) about 'CCC
Mark confusion' on Thu, 12 Feb 2004:
I have
someone is trying their best to find a category that might, possibly,
somehow, match a category but not exactly.
After reading section FCC section 15.247, I have the following question.
Paragraph (b)(4)(ii) states:
(ii) Systems operating in the 5725-5850 MHz band that are used
exclusively for fixed, point-to-point operations may employ
transmitting antennas with directional gain greater than 6 dBi
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Greetings all,
I thought I knew the answer to this and now I am not sure.
My understanding was that if a product type is not listed in the
categories list for the CCC mark then the mark is not required. I have
someone is trying their best to find a
From: Wiz [mailto:wizbc...@charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 7:37 AM
To: EMC Forum
Subject: High Frequency Measurements
Hello,
I have a need to make radiated measurements up to 40 GHz. I uses a low loss
cable that gives me enough dynamic range up to 18GHz. The cable is very
All,
Kyocera Wireless is looking for Regulatory and Support Engineers with
wireless experiences. If anyone is interested, you can check the job
profile/requirements at http://www.kyocera-wireless.com/.
Regards,
CK
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical
All
I have uploaded a small zip file (263k) to the IEEE PSTC website which will
perform these calculations.
Ian Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Kim Boll Jensen [mailto:k...@bolls.dk]
Sent: 12 February 2004 11:13
To: EMC PSTC
Subject: EN 55020 RF test
Hi all
In EN 55020
Hello,
I have a need to make radiated measurements up to 40 GHz. I uses a low loss
cable that gives me enough dynamic range up to 18GHz. The cable is very short
and I have to move my measurements equipment out to the antenna. I know I
need to get a pre-amp and mixer, but what do I do about the
First convert the limit in Volts to micro Volts, then simply take the log of
that number and multiply by 20.
Example:
1) to convert 1 Volt into dBuV
2) 1 Volt = 1,000,000uV
3) 20log 1,000,000 = 120dBuV
To convert dBuv into Volts just work backwards. Divide 120(dBuV) by 20 (=
6) and take the
-Original Message-
From: Kim Boll Jensen [mailto:k...@bolls.dk]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 3:13 AM
To: EMC PSTC
Subject: EN 55020 RF test
Hi all
In EN 55020 immunity to RF e.m. fields it is noted in 5.8.4
that for big
equipment not fitting in the TEM, test as per EN 61000-4-3
Hi
The harmonics limits haven't changed. The method of applying the
limits has changed slightly, but if anything they're easier to meet
now than they were before, so its a reasonable assumption that
your EUT is OK.
Steve Seller - York EMC Services
On 12 Feb 04, at 12:42, Colgan,
dBuV/m = 20* Log (V/m) + 120
V/m = alog([dBuV/m-120]/20)
on 2/12/04 3:13 AM, Kim Boll Jensen at k...@bolls.dk wrote:
Hi all
In EN 55020 immunity to RF e.m. fields it is noted in 5.8.4 that for big
equipment not fitting in the TEM, test as per EN 61000-4-3 is permitted.
My problem
I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Christopher [Harman Pro Group UK]
christopher.col...@harmanpro.com wrote (in 19B228B3F588E64B8FBECDAFD2
578BD41630D9@SCFTUKX1A) about 'EN61000-3-2 mains harmonics' on Thu, 12
Feb 2004:
If I have a product that was tested to EN61000-3-2:1995 + A1:1998 +
A2:1998
I read in !emc-pstc that Kim Boll Jensen k...@bolls.dk wrote (in
jpecimgpcjpkcjgliabaoeibceaa@bolls.dk) about 'EN 55020 RF test' on
Thu, 12 Feb 2004:
In EN 55020 immunity to RF e.m. fields it is noted in 5.8.4 that for big
equipment not fitting in the TEM, test as per EN 61000-4-3 is
Hello all
If I have a product that was tested to EN61000-3-2:1995 + A1:1998 + A2:1998
Class A limits, can I claim compliance to EN61000-3-2:2000 without any
additional testing?
Thanks and regards
Chris Colgan
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee
Derek, I do not believe that there is a harmonized standard that provides
measuring methods
above a gig. However, there is a guidance document that was issued by the
EC Association
of Competent Bodies (ECACB) that can be found at:
Hi all
In EN 55020 immunity to RF e.m. fields it is noted in 5.8.4 that for big
equipment not fitting in the TEM, test as per EN 61000-4-3 is permitted.
My problem is that immunity test levels in EN 55020 is in dB(uV/m) and EN
61000-4-3 is in v/m. How do I convert ?
Best regards,
Kim Boll
Hi all
Is it correct that when measuring with the absorbing clamp (30 - 300 MHz) I
shall not correct for the 17 dB but only for the variation from the 17 dB.
Best regards,
Kim Boll Jensen
Bolls Rådgivning
Ved Gadekæret 11F
DK-3660 Stenløse
Tlf.: 48 18 35 66
Fax: 48 18 35 30
Mobil: 22 99 69
19 matches
Mail list logo
