In a message dated 02/09/2005 20:15:30 GMT Standard Time, j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
writes:
You will soon see IEC standards with initial digits other than 6.
ISO/IEC standards exist already with numbers beginning with 8.
Perhaps, but soon isn't now and 8 isn't 9
Voting terminates on 2005-10-28 (project 77A/503/FDIS - IEC 61000-3-2
Edition 3.0)
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Yours sincerely
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Loerzer
Managing Director
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Chairman of the Product Conformity Group (DIN ANP German Committee of
Standards Users )
Hy,
1.) For general suppliers declarations of conformity please reference the new
ISO/IEC standards and CENELEC guide:
* ISO/IEC 17050-1:2004-10 Conformity assessment - Supplier's declaration
of
conformity - Part 1: General requirements
* ISO/IEC 17050-2:2004-10 Conformity
richhug...@aol.com wrote (in 20f.85d2ba4.3049f...@aol.com) about
'IECEE to make CB test certificates public', on Fri, 2 Sep 2005:
. It's a pity they couldn't figure out that IEC standards start with a
six, which is presumably why the link to 90950 didn't work.
You will soon see IEC standards
Chris,
I was never in any meetings involving the Commission when the WEEE Directive
was being drawn up, so I cannot comment on the accuracy of you assertion below.
It seems more likely to me that - if the Commission even considered distance
selling at all - they took the view that at the
Peter,
Thanks for the interesting URL. It's a pity they couldn't figure out that IEC
standards start with a six, which is presumably why the link to 90950 didn't
work.
Richard
In a message dated 02/09/2005 15:38:49 GMT Standard Time,
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com writes:
Group,
It would be good to find some experience in submitting Specified Product into
the Japanese (Denan) market.
I have a problem with interpreting the quality report that is required to be
completed at the factory, regarding inquires about the equipment used for 5
tests.
Our product is a
Garnier, David S (GE Healthcare) david.garn...@med.ge.com wrote (in
0d7ea72cd324b24d85eecde3d4da8f980339b...@mkemlvem04.e2k.ad.ge.com)
about 'Changes to EN61000-3-2?', on Fri, 2 Sep 2005:
Opps, I mean 3-3.
Sorry, you've got me completely confused. Please state your question
again.
Unless the
Opps, I mean 3-3.
dave...
From: Garnier, David S (GE Healthcare)
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 12:25 PM
To: 'John Woodgate'
Subject: RE: Changes to EN61000-3-2?
Hi John,
I just received a email from IEC webstore and I see the 3-3 revised 3-3
document plus ones for EKG MRI, opps. This
Garnier, David S (GE Healthcare) david.garn...@med.ge.com wrote (in
0d7ea72cd324b24d85eecde3d4da8f980339b...@mkemlvem04.e2k.ad.ge.com)
about 'Changes to EN61000-3-2?', on Fri, 2 Sep 2005:
What has happened to the profession equipment classification in these
changes?
No change.
--
Regards,
jgoedd...@tycoint.com wrote (in
AE34E7FDD9D01F42994924D4C4EB6A4F0A013A91@flbocexu05) about 'How many
declarations', on Fri, 2 Sep 2005:
Is it reasonable, acceptable and wise to combine all our declarations
onto one document?
I should think it's OK to put them on one sheet of paper, if you put
I'd like to get the groups input on the content of the Declaration of
Conformity.
We currently issue a DoC to meet the requirements of CE.
We also have other requirements (Denan, GS sound level, etc.) where a
declaration is needed.
Is it reasonable, acceptable and wise to combine all our
An interesting development.
http://www.iec.ch/online_news/etech/arch_2005/etech_0905/new
s.htm?mlref=etech
Long URL. You may need to unwrap it.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.
Hello,
Does anyone know of a laboratory for hire (preferably in the Northeast US)
that has a 10 meter radiated emissions test site that is also lead shielded
for testing X-ray equipment? The test site would also need 400 or 480 VAC and
greater than 100 ampere power supply capability.
Thanks,
Yes but under the directive the producer is the entity which brings the
product into a MS. If the true manufacturer is outside the EU and has no legal
entity within the MS then the obligation will fall upon whoever bought the
product, be it the end user or an OEM who then integrates the item into
Dear Christine, dear all,
1. The European commission has published the decision 2005/369/EC regarding
monitoring compliance rules
Link to the document: http://europa.eu.
nt/eur-lex/lex/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:119:0013:0016:EN:PDF
2. CENELEC has published an european standard
Also very useful is the international ITU-R Recommendation SM.1538-1 (SM:
Spectrum Matters) which is the international answer to the european CEPT Rec.
70-03. The first download is also free of charge.
Here is the link: http://www.itu.int/rec/recommendation.asp?type=folders
17 matches
Mail list logo
