WEEE and RoHS consultants

2005-09-27 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
I am entertaining the idea of bringing in someone to work with us on these Directives on a short-term consulting basis. If any of you know someone who fits the bill, or is that person, please contact me. The ideal candidate would... - already know details of the legislation issued by each countr

Re: Test Standard

2005-09-27 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Ralph McDiarmid wrote (in ) about 'Test Standard', on Tue, 27 Sep 2005: >That is a very important point and I suspect one which is generally >understood. In particular, it seems to me that meeting the "safety >objectives" of the LVD is the key point, not necessarily which >standards are appl

RE: Test Standard

2005-09-27 Thread emc-pstc@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
John Woodgate wrote: "It isn't strictly correct to say that standards are 'under' Directives, and it can be quite misleading." That is a very important point and I suspect one which is generally understood. In particular, it seems to me that meeting the "safety objectives" of the LVD is the key

Re: Test Standard

2005-09-27 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
rehel...@mmm.com wrote (in ) about 'Test Standard', on Tue, 27 Sep 2005: >Can I test a product to standard under a given Directive if the product >does not fall under that Directive? Of course you CAN, but whether it's a waste of time or not is another matter. It isn't strictly correct to say

RE: Test Standard

2005-09-27 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Bob, You can test any product to any standard. The next question is what do you want to do with the data? Why would you choose that particular standard? Finally, why would anyone else accept the data to represent your product meeting the requirements of the Directive? These are the m

RE: US FORM 740

2005-09-27 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Kim: Go to http://www.fcc.gov/formpage.html Scroll down to Form 740. It does not appear to be a fillable form, so you will have to print it out and fill it in. Regards, John Shinn From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Kim Boll Jensen Sent: Tuesday, September 27,

Test Standard

2005-09-27 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Can I test a product to standard under a given Directive if the product does not fall under that Directive? Bob Heller 3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01 St. Paul, MN 55107-1208 Tel: 651- 778-6336 Fax: 651-778-6252 = - 2005 IEEE Symposium on Product Safety Engineering

Re: US FORM 740

2005-09-27 Thread emc-pstc@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Hi Kim. This form always comes to us via Fax from the importing agent or Shipping Company, and I always fill in the form manually and return it by Fax. This always works, and seems to suit the Customs Officer raising the question in the first place, i.e. it gives him something to put in the file,

RE: Japanese approvals requirements for fixed wireless equipment

2005-09-27 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Dear Charles, Your Radio product has to meet the Japanese requirements laid down in the Japanese Ordonance. 802.11a Wireless tests according to Japanese radio regulation requirments "Ordonance 49.20 sub paragraph 3" 802.11b,g Wireless tests according to Japanese radio regulation requirments "Ordo

Japanese approvals requirements for fixed wireless equipment

2005-09-27 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
All Can anyone confirm/improve my understanding of what is required for a WiMax radio basestation and subscriber terminal? I understand the following are required: Radio - Telec Type Certification Safety - these products are not "Specific Electrical Appliances" nor "Electrical Appliances other

US FORM 740

2005-09-27 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi all Can Form 740 for FCC import declaration be filled on line ? As fare as I can see, the U.S. Customs Service should have this possibility but I can't find it. Best regards, Kim Boll Jensen Bolls Rådgivning Ved Gadekæret 11F DK-3660 Stenløse Tlf.: 48 18 35 66 Fax: 48 18 35 30 Mobil: 22

Directive 2004/104/EC automotive EMC

2005-09-27 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi all I'm a little confused about some information I have got on 3. hand. Officially I can see that the directive is active as pr. 1/1 2006 but now some one told me that it can be used from 19/10 2005. What is the official status and is it country dependant ? Best regards, Kim Boll Jensen Bol