Fwd: Re: RF Power Amplifiers

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Bob Richards b...@toprudder.com wrote: List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:34:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Bob Richards b...@toprudder.com Subject: Re: RF Power Amplifiers To: Grace Lin graceli...@gmail.com I don't believe that formula takes into account the need for 80%

RE: RF Power Amplifiers

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Return Receipt Your RE: RF Power Amplifiers document:

Re: China RoHS Common QA

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Thanks. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yours sincerely Dipl.-Ing. Michael Loerzer Managing Director Regulatory Affairs Specialist Chairman of the Product Conformity Group (DIN ANP German Committee of Standards Users) GLOBALNORM - Global Regulatory Compliance Fon: +49 30 6392-3860, Direct Call:

RE: RF Power Amplifiers

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Return Receipt Your RE: RF Power Amplifiers document:

RE: RF Power Amplifiers

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Return Receipt Your RE: RF Power Amplifiers document:

RE: RF Power Amplifiers

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Grace For the 80-100 range the power sounds about right, but be careful many amplifiers will ouptut reduced power if the VSWR at their output exceeds 2:1. For the other ranges the 75 W should be more like 25-50 W, again depending on the amplifier and VSWR. The high frequency amplifier should be

RF Power Amplifiers

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Dear Group Members, Please help me to determine specification for RF power amplifiers for 61000-4-3 and 61000-4-6 tests. I found an equation to calculate power required (ETS-Lindgren Antenna Catalog, page 71): PdB(W) = 20 log10 (Edesired(V/m)) +20 log10 (d m) – 20 log10 (fMHz)

RE: China RoHS Common QA

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Ni Hao, Grace, Nà shì hen hao, xièxiè nín. Don _ From: Grace Lin [mailto:graceli...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 12:28 PM To: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org Subject: Re: China RoHS Common QA Hi Don, 3C means CCC. China uses 3C to stand for CCC. It is

RE: Laser safety AEL calculation - angular subtense and C6

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Kyaw: It may help to see IEC Technical Report TR 60825-10 Safety of laser products Part 10: Application guidelines and explanatory notes to IEC 60825-1, Sections 9 Intrabeam Viewing, and 10, Extended Source Viewing. Also see IEC Technical Report TR 60825-14 Safety of laser products Part 14: A

Re: China RoHS Common QA

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi Don, 3C means CCC. China uses 3C to stand for CCC. It is easier, and less characters. Business to business supply type is NOT under scope of the China RoHS law (the Measure). I hope this helps. Best regards, Grace On 6/8/06, Don Gies d...@lucent.com wrote: Grace, In the Q A,

Re: China RoHS Common QA

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi Michael, I will let you know when the translation version is available. Best regards, Grace On 6/8/06, M. Loerzer-Mobile (GLOBALNORM) loerzer_mob...@globalnorm.de wrote: Hi Grace, do have an english version? Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yours sincerely Dipl.-Ing. Michael Loerzer

Laser safety AEL calculation - angular subtense and C6

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Dear Good People Our product is a class II laser scanning engine. The original source of laser is from a laser diode. It passes through a lens and strikes two subtended mirrors before it goes out for scanning. According to IEC 60825-1, AEL limit is defined as C6x10-3W where C6 is based on angular

RE: China RoHS Common QA

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Grace, In the Q A, they use the English term “3C” a lot, for instance in QA 1, 4, 5, 6, and 35. Is this “CCC”? Also, in QA 10 and 12, they talk about “business to business” and “B2B” in contrast with “business to consumer” and “B2C”. Is there a general exemption for

Re: IEC601-1-2 ESD

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
The test levels of + 2 kV, + 4 kV, and + 6 kV for contact discharges shall be applied to medical equipment. Bob Heller 3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01 St. Paul, MN 55107-1208 Tel: 651- 778-6336 Fax: 651-778-6252 =

Re: China RoHS Common QA

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi Grace, do have an english version? Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yours sincerely Dipl.-Ing. Michael Loerzer Managing Director Regulatory Affairs Specialist Chairman of the Product Conformity Group (DIN ANP German Committee of Standards Users) GLOBALNORM - Global Regulatory Compliance Fon:

RE: Legal Standards

2006-06-08 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Wendy, FCC and ETSI standards are free and legal for download and reproduction. I'm not aware of any others. Respectfully, Brent DeWitt Everett, WA _ From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of wendy Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 1:42 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org