Hello Colleagues,
I was recently approached regarding the testing of DC conducted emissions on a
car charger for a 2 Way Portable radio and if it is required.
The applicable EMC standard per the RTTE Directive would be 301 489-5, which
basically falls back on 301 489-1 without any special
David –
You might consider ANSI T1.315-2001 “Voltage Levels for DC-Powered Equipment
Used in the Telecommunications Environment”. This standard contains tests
addressing transients, immunity, under voltage and others. There are some test
setups included.
Regards,
Paul Stover, NCE
Hello,
Does anyone know of a standardized test for simulating power glitches or
interruptions on the output of a DC power supply? I am not interested in
testing susceptibility of the AC power input but creating some sort of
standardized interruption of the DC supply's output voltage supply.
Doug,
Here is the link to their official website (in English):
http://english.gost.ru/sls/gost.nsf?OpenALT
John Radomski
Principal Engineer
Schneider Automation Inc.
In message a7769e7222893043ae07d32e8d22545531c...@bssexc06.aei.com,
dated Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Powell, Doug doug.pow...@aei.com writes
I have this link:
http://www.gost-r.info/what-russian-certification.php; which mentions
the list of products requiring certification. But I was unable to find
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
All,
I have this link: http://www.gost-r.info/what-russian-certification.php;
which mentions the list of products requiring certification. But I was
unable to find the actual list. Can anyone point me in the right
direction?
Thanks a bunch,
-doug
A global auditing, testing and certification company has openings for Product
Safety Engineers and Senior Product Safety Engineers in their Austin, San
Diego, Portland, SF Bay Area and Boston offices. The position largely
entails testing, certification and project management. Those interested
In message jpecimgpcjpkcjgliabaceohdaaa@bolls.dk, dated Tue, 25
Jul 2006, Kim Boll Jensen k...@bolls.dk writes
Why can UL/CSA 60950 accept this when CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 223-M91 can't ?
(or have UL made a mistake when approving the PSU for CSA 60950 ?)
With only 5.1 mm gap, it might be
From: Kim Boll Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 6:33 AM
Why can UL/CSA 60950 accept this when CAN/CSA-C22.2 No.
223-M91 can't ? (or
have UL made a mistake when approving the PSU for CSA 60950 ?)
Best regards,
Kim Boll Jensen
Hello, Kim.
CSA/UL 60950-1 made a conscious
Ghery makes two good points-
#1- Check with local authorities, not just customers- as
customers may not be up to date on accreditation rules.
#2- If a company is not marketing their product to the U.S.,
then perhaps NVLAP, A2LA and U.S. MRA's are not required.
Hi Eric,
Lots of luck, all of it bad! I did the NSA on the IBM/Siemens/Rolm 10 meter
chamber in Santa Clara about eight years ago and it was a struggle to get to
30 MHz. Admittedly, this was a pure 2 meter cone absorber (no tile), but I
haven't heard any success stories down at 13 MHz (not that
11 matches
Mail list logo
