Re: [PSES] Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
The owners manual says to set the parking brake, called the e brake by the kids since they think it for an emergnecy stop, when stopped and the car is in park. Why? Take a transmission apart and have a look at the park gear. It's a trivial piece of hardware that will hold an already stopped

RE: [PSES] Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
I shifted from neutral to reverse once, while going about 60mph forward. (Non-intentional, I must add). It actually went into reverse. The rear tires locked up, but I was able to quickly shift back to neutral and coasted to a stop on the side of the road. I expected to see transmission fluid

Re: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
And some vehicles (my Nissan Frontier, for example) will not lock the steering until the key is actually pulled out of the column. Putting the key back in does not unlock it, it must be turned before it unlocks. I used this feature when I pulled it behind my old motorhome with all wheels on the

RE: [PSES] Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
I have always wondered about this but never had the cojones (or the requisite emergency) to try it. Gary, Since you have been through this please share if the car came to a reasonably controlled stop or if it was a wild ride. Best Regards, Mike From: emc-p...@ieee.org

RE: [PSES] Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Oh transmission aren't all that invulnerable. I thought it was impossible to get a transmission into part while doing about 60. An old girlfriend proved me wrong about that - *(*#REN#Y$I243()(@$)(@!! Anybody want some smooth gears and a pile of scrap metal Gary McInturff 208 635 8306 From:

[Fwd: FW: [PSES]: Any good safety consultants out there?]

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Posted for Dave Osborn Subject:FW: [PSES]: Any good safety consultants out there? List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:10:49 +0100 From: Osborn, Dave dave.osb...@philips.com To:

Re: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Ed. Your last para opens speculation that the end result might have been intentional. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Price, Edward ed.pr...@cubic.com wrote: I’m a little uncomfortable with the tone of Keith’s article at:

Re: energy efficiency regulations

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Ouch. Brian, you may well have browsed this site but here's the contacts page for an official enquiry. http://www.eeca.govt.nz/about-eeca/contact-us It's probable that the NZ EECA position will be subordinate to the Australian Authority's. Thanks. Bruce Maule (in New Zealand) John

Re: energy efficiency regulations

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message 001901cab005$0442eb60$d600a...@tamuracorp.com, dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Brian O'Connell oconne...@tamuracorp.com writes: The NZ website says that vendors will be required to comply 'by early 2010', but has no date - any links to actual dates ? If you ask an Australian, he will

RE: energy efficiency regulations

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Brian, Level IV compliance per the international efficiency marking protocol is required for all product arriving in the EU as of April 27, 2010, with level V required by same day in 2011. your citation is valid. In the US level IV is already required on all newly manufactured supplies, with the

Re: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
The steering lockout is still not a problem on the modern cars I have driven. On those with automatic transmission (runaway is hardly a problem on a car with manual transmission--just depress the clutch pedal to disengage power), there has always been an ignition off position before steering

Re: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message 9d04b979323dcd428297dda95108893e03a18...@bb-corp-ex2.corp.cubic.cub, dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Price, Edward ed.pr...@cubic.com writes: he?s expounding on life-and-death reliability, but I get a feeling that he is getting a bit alarmist. There aren't so many of us in the UK, with the

energy efficiency regulations

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Good People, I have found the following dates for affectivity and/or date required for compliance. My corporate colleagues in Asia do not agree with these dates. I would appreciate any additional information for dates. Required conformity dates for various power efficiency regulations for

RE: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
I’m a little uncomfortable with the tone of Keith’s article at: http://www.nutwooduk.co.uk/downloads/Toyota.doc True, he’s expounding on life-and-death reliability, but I get a feeling that he is getting a bit alarmist. I also find it interesting that the USA NHTSB is seeking out a UK

Re: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message 6294cce6b4ce7d4d81822d7408e0d65709c3120...@echoexcc1.sats.corp, dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Grasso, Charles charles.gra...@echostar.com writes: I agree with Johns comments. I just hope that he was not ill-advised. Looking at the title its my impression that Keith is forcibly making

Re: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Oh that's funny. Reminds me of nearly the same only it was a Ford Falcon and when the spring broke, the mechanical arrangement and weight defaulted to wide open. I'm sure glad that was before the steering lockout when the key is turned off. Now they are going to no throttle when the brake is

RE: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Correction – Keith is the one potentially jumping to conclusions, not John. Sorry for any confusion (certainly a moment of such on my part). Ghery S. Pettit From: Pettit, Ghery Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 8:27 AM To: 'Grasso, Charles'; 'Andrew McCallum';

RE: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
I recall having a car go WOT while driving when I was in high school. Long (looong) before electronic throttle control. As in a 1963 Rambler. The throttle return spring had broken when I stepped on the gas while accelerating. Turning off the ignition was the simple immediate action.

RE: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
I agree with Johns comments. Looking at the title its my impression that Keith is forcibly making the case that EMI and/or manufacturing practices caused this crash. This is a dangerous case to make considering that there is no evidence of what caused the crash. As John points out – one can

Codice del Consumo

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Anyone out there have any experience with the Italian legislation Codice del Consumo Legislative Decree no. 206/2005 – maybe email me off line Thanks, Chris - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list,

IEEE EMC Chicago Chapter meeting Tonight IEC Conducted Immunity Standards Edition 2 Updates 2004 - 2009

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
IEC 61000-4-2, -4, -5, -11 standards revisions and their implications to the practicing EMC Test Engineer For additional details, see our website, http://www.emcchicago.org Hope to see you there. Frank Krozel Frank Krozel http://www.electronicinstrument.com Tel: 630-924-1600 - This

Re: Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message 946f26262d1d3a43bc6b5114c624f26c16c1921...@delvspr01.deltarail.com, dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Andrew McCallum andrew.mccal...@deltarail.com writes: See link for Keith Armstrongs view:     http://www.nutwooduk.co.uk/downloads/Toyota.doc quick link : Full article here... I hope

RE: [PSES] Arcade games

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Just to confirm, being a member of the CISPR/I committee responsible, CISPR 32 is intended to be issued as a CDV within the next few months. From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: 17 February 2010 08:58 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Arcade games In

Re: Arcade games

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA4890A7005@ZEUS.cetest.local, dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl writes: There is a new cispr for multimedia / office /receiver standard in development. 'is' is a big word. There 'will be'. In

Toyota

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
See link for Keith Armstrongs view: http://www.nutwooduk.co.uk/downloads/Toyota.doc http://www.nutwooduk.co.uk/downloads/Toyota.doc quick link : Full article here... http //www.nutwooduk.co.uk/downloads/Toyota.doc Andrew McCallum Senior EMC Engineer DeltaRail Group Plc

RE: Arcade games

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Derek, and Group There is a new cispr for multimedia / office /receiver standard in development. In addition to the 14 or generic you could justify using parts of this standard. It's reference is CISPR 32. It will take at least 3-5 years before this will be harmonized as EN 55032. Workgroup

RE: [PSES] Arcade games

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hello Derek, EN 55014 is indeed orientated to household products. However, it is also the most appropriate standard for arcade and gaming machines as they are specifically listed within it. It clearly refers to entertainment machines, pin ball machines, video machines, winnings payout, etc,

Re: Arcade games

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message 4b7b8257.8030...@aol.com, dated Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Derek Walton lfresea...@aol.com writes: I'm looking for the appropriate product standard for arcade, by this I mean professional, games. eg Pinball machines, dart games etc. EN55014 has been suggested, but this really seems oriented

Arcade games

2010-02-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
HI All, I'm looking for the appropriate product standard for arcade, by this I mean professional, games. eg Pinball machines, dart games etc. EN55014 has been suggested, but this really seems oriented to household use. Thanks in advance, Derek Walton L F Research - This message is from the