The owners manual says to set the parking brake, called the e brake by the
kids since they think it for an emergnecy stop, when stopped and the car is in
park. Why? Take a transmission apart and have a look at the park gear. It's
a trivial piece of hardware that will hold an already stopped
I shifted from neutral to reverse once, while going about 60mph forward.
(Non-intentional, I must add). It actually went into reverse. The rear tires
locked up, but I was able to quickly shift back to neutral and coasted to a
stop on the side of the road. I expected to see transmission fluid
And some vehicles (my Nissan Frontier, for example) will not lock the steering
until the key is actually pulled out of the column. Putting the key back in
does not unlock it, it must be turned before it unlocks.
I used this feature when I pulled it behind my old motorhome with all wheels
on the
I have always wondered about this but never had the cojones (or the
requisite emergency) to try it.
Gary,
Since you have been through this please share if the car came to a
reasonably controlled stop or if it was a wild ride.
Best Regards,
Mike
From: emc-p...@ieee.org
Oh transmission aren't all that invulnerable. I thought it was
impossible to get a transmission into part while doing about 60. An old
girlfriend proved me wrong about that - *(*#REN#Y$I243()(@$)(@!!
Anybody want some smooth gears and a pile of scrap metal
Gary McInturff
208 635 8306
From:
Posted for Dave Osborn
Subject:FW: [PSES]: Any good safety consultants out there?
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:10:49 +0100
From: Osborn, Dave dave.osb...@philips.com
To:
Ed. Your last para opens speculation that the end result might have been
intentional.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Price, Edward ed.pr...@cubic.com wrote:
I’m a little uncomfortable with the tone of Keith’s article at:
Ouch.
Brian, you may well have browsed this site but here's the contacts page for an
official enquiry.
http://www.eeca.govt.nz/about-eeca/contact-us
It's probable that the NZ EECA position will be subordinate to the Australian
Authority's.
Thanks.
Bruce Maule (in New Zealand)
John
In message 001901cab005$0442eb60$d600a...@tamuracorp.com, dated Wed,
17 Feb 2010, Brian O'Connell oconne...@tamuracorp.com writes:
The NZ website says that vendors will be required to comply 'by early
2010', but has no date - any links to actual dates ?
If you ask an Australian, he will
Brian,
Level IV compliance per the international efficiency marking protocol is
required for all product arriving in the EU as of April 27, 2010, with level V
required by same day in 2011. your citation is valid.
In the US level IV is already required on all newly manufactured supplies,
with the
The steering lockout is still not a problem on the modern cars I have
driven. On those with automatic transmission (runaway is hardly a problem
on a car with manual transmission--just depress the clutch pedal to
disengage power), there has always been an ignition off position before
steering
In message
9d04b979323dcd428297dda95108893e03a18...@bb-corp-ex2.corp.cubic.cub,
dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Price, Edward ed.pr...@cubic.com writes:
he?s expounding on life-and-death reliability, but I get a feeling that
he is getting a bit alarmist.
There aren't so many of us in the UK, with the
Good People,
I have found the following dates for affectivity and/or date required for
compliance. My corporate colleagues in Asia do not agree with these dates.
I would appreciate any additional information for dates.
Required conformity dates for various power efficiency regulations for
I’m a little uncomfortable with the tone of Keith’s article at:
http://www.nutwooduk.co.uk/downloads/Toyota.doc
True, he’s expounding on life-and-death reliability, but I get a feeling
that he is getting a bit alarmist. I also find it interesting that the USA
NHTSB is seeking out a UK
In message
6294cce6b4ce7d4d81822d7408e0d65709c3120...@echoexcc1.sats.corp, dated
Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Grasso, Charles charles.gra...@echostar.com
writes:
I agree with Johns comments.
I just hope that he was not ill-advised.
Looking at the title its my impression that Keith is forcibly making
Oh that's funny. Reminds me of nearly the same only it was a Ford Falcon and
when the spring broke, the mechanical arrangement and weight defaulted to wide
open. I'm sure glad that was before the steering lockout when the key is
turned off. Now they are going to no throttle when the brake is
Correction – Keith is the one potentially jumping to conclusions, not John.
Sorry for any confusion (certainly a moment of such on my part).
Ghery S. Pettit
From: Pettit, Ghery
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 8:27 AM
To: 'Grasso, Charles'; 'Andrew McCallum';
I recall having a car go WOT while driving when I was in high school. Long
(looong) before electronic throttle control. As in a 1963 Rambler. The
throttle return spring had broken when I stepped on the gas while
accelerating. Turning off the ignition was the simple immediate action.
I agree with Johns comments. Looking at the title its my impression that Keith
is forcibly making the case
that EMI and/or manufacturing practices caused this crash. This is a dangerous
case to make considering
that there is no evidence of what caused the crash.
As John points out – one can
Anyone out there have any experience with the Italian legislation Codice del
Consumo Legislative Decree no. 206/2005 – maybe email me off line
Thanks,
Chris
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list,
IEC 61000-4-2, -4, -5, -11 standards revisions and their implications to the
practicing EMC Test Engineer
For additional details, see our website, http://www.emcchicago.org
Hope to see you there.
Frank Krozel
Frank Krozel
http://www.electronicinstrument.com
Tel: 630-924-1600
-
This
In message
946f26262d1d3a43bc6b5114c624f26c16c1921...@delvspr01.deltarail.com,
dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Andrew McCallum andrew.mccal...@deltarail.com
writes:
See link for Keith Armstrongs view:
http://www.nutwooduk.co.uk/downloads/Toyota.doc
quick link : Full article here...
I hope
Just to confirm, being a member of the CISPR/I committee responsible, CISPR
32 is intended to be issued as a CDV within the next few months.
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 17 February 2010 08:58
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Arcade games
In
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA4890A7005@ZEUS.cetest.local,
dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl writes:
There is a new cispr for multimedia / office /receiver standard in
development.
'is' is a big word. There 'will be'.
In
See link for Keith Armstrongs view:
http://www.nutwooduk.co.uk/downloads/Toyota.doc
http://www.nutwooduk.co.uk/downloads/Toyota.doc
quick link : Full article here... http
//www.nutwooduk.co.uk/downloads/Toyota.doc
Andrew McCallum
Senior EMC Engineer
DeltaRail Group Plc
Derek, and Group
There is a new cispr for multimedia / office /receiver standard in development.
In addition to the 14 or generic you could
justify using parts of this standard.
It's reference is CISPR 32.
It will take at least 3-5 years before this will be
harmonized as EN 55032.
Workgroup
Hello Derek,
EN 55014 is indeed orientated to household products. However, it is also
the most appropriate standard for arcade and gaming machines as they are
specifically listed within it. It clearly refers to entertainment
machines, pin ball machines, video machines, winnings payout, etc,
In message 4b7b8257.8030...@aol.com, dated Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Derek
Walton lfresea...@aol.com writes:
I'm looking for the appropriate product standard for arcade, by this I
mean professional, games. eg Pinball machines, dart games etc.
EN55014 has been suggested, but this really seems oriented
HI All,
I'm looking for the appropriate product standard for arcade, by this I
mean professional, games. eg Pinball machines, dart games etc.
EN55014 has been suggested, but this really seems oriented to household
use.
Thanks in advance,
Derek Walton
L F Research
-
This message is from the
29 matches
Mail list logo