Hello, Gary;
EN 60601-1-2: 2007 requirements for ME specify +/- 2, 4, and 6 kV for Contact
discharge, and +/- 2, 4, and 8 kV for Air discharge.
Note that any patient-coupled signals (to or from the patient) must be
simulated, but that doing so must not provide an intentional conductive or
capa
Can’t find my standard
Gary McInturff
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and sea
Sometimes this just runs you in a circle, because the military can buy things
COTS (Commercial Off The Shelf) when they don’t need the quality and
reliability assured by MIL Standards. For instance, the Colonel’s coffeepot
can be COTS, but that coffeepot should never end up in a tactical
communicat
As Mr. O’Connell noted, the mark is required on the plug, connector
and cable. If you are trying to minimize the number of different cords, you
can find some cords with Japanese and North American approvals. Volex is one
supplier that has these cords .
I am not specifically endorsing this supp
HI Chris,
If this radio is for the exclusive use of a U.S. federal government agency,
you need to look at the contract requirements to determine what if any testing
they need to have done. CFR47 does not have any test/application
requirements applicable to products used/sold only to the federal
Folks,
I am trying to understand what steps we need to take to certify a 4.5GHz radio
product.
If anyone knows of an URL or test lab than can help us in this process, your
help is appreciated.
Regards
Christopher
408-688-0265
-
-
China requires CCC mark (and license) on cordage and plug.
Chuck McDowell
Meyer Sound Laboratories Inc.
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Harrington
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:01 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Power cable markings for Japan
Diamond-type PSE
Be careful, there are some Asian companies that place the PSE marks on input
cords that are NOT METI registered.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of John Harrington
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:01 PM
To: emc-p...@
Gentlemen
What markings have to be present on a detachable power cable shipped to Japan
with a piece of test and measurements equipment?
Are their similar marking requirements for other Asian countries?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards
John Harrington
Compliance Engineer
Ke
This seems to have become unnecessarily complicated.
If a standard changes, and you do some new testing or evaluation, then
updating the D of C to reflect that is quite sensible. Your TF will show the
new work done to support it.
If a standard changes, and you have a quick look at the differe
I agree with this, but for completeness I would add that to the sentence that
“the DoC must be updated if you want to maintain a ‘presumption of conformity’
with the EMC Directive.”
Strictly speaking the DoC does not have to be updated if there is some
technical justification for not doing s
Bear in mind that under the latest EMC Directive, the DoC must contain "dated
references" (i.e., the standards tested to and their dates)(see note). If the
dates of the standards change then the DoC must be updated.
Note: Reference Directive 2004/108/EC, Annex IV, paragraph 2, fourth item.
Bob
Hello Peter,
for this issue we have developed the „DoC-Manager“ with an interface to our
standards management software GLOBALNORM. If you are interested we can present
this tool via a telephoe conference. I also attend the IEEE PSES symposium in
Boston and we have a booth at the exhibition i
13 matches
Mail list logo
