Thank you very much, Ken.
After reading your comments, I did Google search using the word of
pre-compliance. Pages 68-69 of an R&S presentation file (
http://www.rohde-schwarz.com.vn/file_15628/EMC_Precompliance_Solutions.pdf)
provides some hints. The FSP (replaced by FSV) is a precompliance
ins
While the "N" standards for National, enforcement of the NEC for non-workplaces
is with the AHJs which generally aren't looking at consumer products unless
they are integrated into new construction and part of permit inspection. I've
not found any national enforcement of the NEC apart from OSHA
Hello All:
I know this topic has been discussed before, so I apologize in advance.
For several years I have told my clients that *IN PRINCIPLE*, an NRTL
listing for consumer-grade wireline telecom equipment (telephones, fax
machines, answering machines, etc.) is not mandatory in the USA. I
Doug
No EU Model Building Codes over here, so it's a matter of the national regs!
Name the countries in which you are interested and someone (not me!) may be
able to help.
Regards
John
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Nix [mailto:d...@mac.com]
Sent: 18 February 2015 15:08
To: EMC-PST
Since even radiated spurious emissions for FCC licensed radios is ERP/EIRP
measurements, currently it would not matter a whole lot. Currently the only
requirement to use CISPR 16 for analyzers for licensed devices is in TIA603
when TEM cells are used.
However, for part 15 devices, where radi
Doug, Mike, Dave, and all, thank you for the information. Though most of you
have already known this and it seems like basic information, this is exactly
the kind of things a test lab might overlook and be doing wrong for years, or
at least not in the most efficient way. I love this email group.
Colleagues,
Does anyone have any pointers to the EU regulations relating to temporary,
portable buildings?
Cheers,
Doug Nix
d...@ieee.org
+1 519 729 5704
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
I believe CISPR16 is for EMC only.
If it is for radio aspects not being spurious emissions, CISPR16 is not
applicable.
I do own a FSP and the test results obtained are very suitable for radio, and
the EMC test results (with a pre-amp) do match our TEST receivers result very
good
and accuracy is
In message <54e44177.2010...@gmail.com>, dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Scott
Douglas writes:
We are being told by this test lab that we must provide them the URL of
our web site where power consumption is published. We have not gotten
the data in the report yet so do not really know the numbers at
In message
,
dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Scott Xe writes:
. The designer wants the testing house to classify the product as
class I appliance by using 3-pin connectors, 3-core mains cord, 3-pin
mains plug without any connection of earth path to the circuitry
It cannot be Class 1 because, as
10 matches
Mail list logo
