I hope EN/UL 62368-1 2014 will be implemented on 20 Jun 2019 replacing EN 60065
and EN 60950-1. When will EN 60335 be replaced with one standard?
Scott
From: Richard Nute
Reply-To:
Date: Thursday, 14 July 2016 at 7:25 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] Applicable standards for hoverboard in
One of our EMC test chambers has had to apply for a Non-Operational
Transmission licence (now issued), from Ofcom here in the UK, despite arguments
that any emissions were mitigated by the 100dB screening (or more), provided by
the chamber. Ofcom are also apparently insisting on licences for tes
It sounds complying UL 2272 still fails to convince stopping catch fire
completely. Let see later how the new products perform.
Scott
On 14/7/2016, 3:34 AM, "Brian O'Connell" wrote:
While NRTLs are allowed to apply just about any standard deemed 'necessary',
should be noted that 2272 not y
I agree with Rich that is one of the problems, and I would add that it is the
main problem with the proliferation of product-specific standards.
If the principles of product safety (shock, energy, mechanical, chemical) are
universal, then it should be possible to write 2 or 3 generic product saf
Consider the profound question, 'How do we get there from here?'. Taking into
account how long it took to produce 62386-1 from two former standards ('how
long' is indeterminate, because it’s still being improved), how long would it
take to turn the 111 standards in 60335 into one? Answer in cen
> how long would it take to turn the 111 standards in
> 60335 into one?
I envision a standard for each energy source, for example electric shock.
Electric shock from a toaster, or cooker, or microwave, is the same as electric
shock from a TV, or computer, or voltmeter. This is largely recogni
One standard for each energy source is a good idea, but there are six or more
sources, so it would not be swiftly done.
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only
www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
Is there a homeopathic remedy for excessive gullibility
I can see one advantage of product-specific standards. They are generally, but
not always, easier for a novice to apply them correctly. The product-specific
standards cover the hazards of that product in detail and typically require
less engineering judgement or analysis. This may be helpful on
HELP
Selex ES Ltd
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14
3EL
A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
r
9 matches
Mail list logo
