Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 3:46 PM
To: Stultz, Mark ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Radiated Emissions - How many points to QP?
You don't often get email from
la...@complianceworldwide.com<mailto:la...@complianceworldwide.com>. Learn why
this is important<https
Hello PSES brain trust,
When doing radiated emissions measurements, how many frequencies should be
quasi-peaked?
CISPR 16-2-3 clause 6.4.9 states:
"Of those disturbances above (L-20dB), where L is the limit level in
logarithmic units, the disturbance levels and the frequencies of at least the
Hi Brian,
Since this is machinery, typically IEC 60204-1 would be applied. Check out
clause 8.2.6 Additional requirements for electrical equipment having earth
leakage currents higher than 10 mA.
Best regards,
Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | AUTOBAG(r) brand Equipment | Streetsboro,
OH
Wouldn't this fall under the requirement from 60204-1 clause 5.3.5 for Excepted
Circuits?
"Permanent warning label(s) shall be appropriately placed in proximity to the
operating means of the supply disconnecting device to draw attention to the
hazard"
Best regards,
Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) |
Hi Brian,
You may want to consider repeating test #3 after environmental conditioning.
The true test of a plating is corrosion resistance over time.
Best of luck,
Mark Stultz | CMSE | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro,
OH | 330-342-2402
From: Brian Kunde
Sent: Tuesday,
The draft instrument Product Safety and Metrology (Amendment and Transitional
Provisions) Regulations 2022 was reviewed and approved by the Joint Committee
on Statutory Instruments on 2022-11-23 (
https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/31741/documents/178147/default/)
It now needs to be
Hi Brian,
I recommend reading section 3 of the RoHS 2 FAQ:
https://environment.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-01/FAQ%20key%20guidance%20document%20-%20RoHS.pdf
Here's a few relevant snippets; there is more explanation in the document:
In order to benefit from either exclusion the tool or
I love these clips for the lab and prototyping work, but check the ratings
before using on any equipment in the field. In the US, most NRTLs consider
this a splice which is not allowed on machinery by NFPA 79. In the EU, these
parts tend to be rated only for use in structures, not equipment.
FZAYLCXPFF1c%3D=0>
<mailto:jcoch...@strongarm.com>
215-443-3400 x219
From: Stultz, Mark
<0f79f2e10e47-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F0f79f2e10e47-dmarc-request%40listserv.ieee.org%2F=05%7C01
Hi Frank,
Can you do a longer ground that allows moving the cover to the side? In my
experience it is risky to design a system where the ground is routinely
disconnected. If you need to design it that way, I recommend using a braided
gasket that is partially compressed when the panel is
Hi Brian,
The IP ratings apply to continuous situations unless stated otherwise. So IPX2
means that water drops can be continuously falling at 3mm/min when the EUT is
tilted up to 15°. The test lasts for 2.5 minutes per side, but the environment
is considered continuous. For our machinery
Ted brings up a great point and it a good reminder that, in addition to the
standards, you need a cross-functional risk analysis. This is why I always
bring in a Service Tech from the field to take part in the risk analysis. They
have shown me several "tool holders" over the years.
Mark
Hi Gary,
I would be very cautious here. Magnetic attraction can degrade over time due
to a variety of factors (thermal cycling, plating migration, corrosion,
magnetic field cycling, among others). While the appliance is stationary, what
about damage due to shock or vibration during shipping?
me you see them "in the wild".
Doug Nix
d...@ieee.org<mailto:d...@ieee.org>
+1 (519) 729-5704
On 1-Feb-22, at 13:24, Stultz, Mark
<0f79f2e10e47-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org<mailto:0f79f2e10e47-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>>
wrote:
Hello,
Is ther
Hello,
Is there a hard limit for leakage current for machinery in the EU? IEC 60204-1
provides instructions in clause 8.2.8 for "equipment having earth leakage
currents higher than 10 mA". This seems quite high so we have applied the 3.5
mA limits for class 1 stationary equipment in IEC
Hello,
Does anyone know of an ISO or IEC symbol for short circuit current rating? Is
it acceptable to abbreviate as SCCR or will this need translated?
Thanks,
Mark Stultz
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
We build a top-level generic and then pack the power cord right before crating.
Where we run into issues is when we have a distributor in Europe or Asia
orders the machine based on their location but the end-user is in a different
country.
Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | Automated
Wonderful, Thanks!
Mark Stultz | CMSE® | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro,
OH | 330-342-2402
From: Graevinghoff Andreas (ETAS/NE)
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 12:13 PM
To: Stultz, Mark ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Demo exception for EAC certification
Machinery and many other products require EAC certification or declaration
prior to "placing on the market" in Russia or other EAEU countries. Does
anyone know if there is an exception for demo or trade show machines?
Thanks in advance,
Mark Stultz
10175 Philipp Parkway
Senior Mechanical
Hello all,
Is it permissible to combined separate conductors to carry a load in parallel
within machinery? If it is allowable, what derating would be required? I
can't find reference to this in IEC 60204-1 or NFPA 79.
Many thanks,
Mark Stultz
10175 Philipp Parkway
Senior Mechanical
: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 9:54 AM
To: Stultz, Mark
Cc: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [PSES] engineering rules of thumb
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe
My apologies for the meeting spam...
Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro,
OH | 330-342-2402
-Original Appointment-
From: Stultz, Mark <0f79f2e10e47-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> On Behalf
Of Stultz, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, March 16,
:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN="Stultz, Mark":mailto:mark.stu...@sealedair.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=doug emces
d.com:mailto:d...@
:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN="Stultz, Mark":mailto:mark.stu...@sealedair.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=doug emces
d.com:mailto:d...@
Hello,
In an effort to get more accurate pre-compliance measurements, we're looking
into building an OATS setup. Does anyone know of any companies in the US that
will install/build one?
Thanks,
Mark Stultz
10175 Philipp Parkway
Senior Mechanical Development Engineer
Streetsboro, OH 44241
Packaging Systems | Streetsboro,
OH | 330-342-2402
From: Curt McNamara
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 12:50 PM
To: Stultz, Mark
Cc: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [PSES] Use of Electrical Enclosure as the Ground Bus
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization
Hello,
I'm working with an engineering team that wants to use the electrical enclosure
as the bus for the bonding circuit. The item is a smallish piece of machinery
for indoor industrial use. The motivation is to save the cost of a separate
copper busbar and reduce the length of bonding
Hi David,
We faced a similar issue with our machinery as it includes a custom-built air
reservoir. We reached the opposite conclusion as the SPVD only includes the
following exclusions (in Article 1 clause 2):
2. This Directive shall not apply to:
1. vessels specifically designed for
Anyone know where to find vector files (dxf, ai, pdf, et cetera) for the PSE
mark for Japan? Or dimension requirements?
Thanks,
[cid:image001.png@01D5F87E.2E1AE560]
Mark Stultz
10175 Philipp Parkway
Senior Mechanical Development Engineer
Streetsboro, OH 44241
CMSE® - Certified Machinery
Hello Kevin,
Thanks for the great explanation. Who is ultimately responsible for ensuring
that equipment is certified by a NRTL? Does the final responsibility fall on
the purchaser/end-user or on the manufacturer?
Best regards,
Mark Stultz | CMSE® | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems
Hello,
Anyone know of a good tester for IEC 60204-1 and 60335-1 residual voltage
that's available in the US? I'm looking at
http://www.stanmax.nl/index.php/msom/ but not sure about leadtime from NL.
Thanks!
[cid:image001.png@01D5DA7B.4CAEE2E0]
Mark Stultz
10175 Philipp Parkway
Senior
Japan's PSE marking regulations require product testing on the manufacturing
line. For generic appliances, the test requirements are "Appearance,
Dielectric strength, and Energization". Anyone know what they mean by
"Energization"? Is this just a functional operation test? Is it ground/bond
32 matches
Mail list logo