Thanks Ghery,
The unit is passing now, after we sandblasted the inside of the chassis for
some radiated emissions problems. There was a little bit of paint between the
line filter and the chassis, so the grounding wasn't that great.
Thanks,
Tim Pierce
Hello everyone,
I have worked with sites that used the hardware cloth (screen) over concrete
in the past. When the tears would happen, they would patch that area with
screen to cover the hole and maintain continuity. Can this patching create a
problem with site attenuation, if there are too
Hello everyone,
Thanks for your input. I can go somewhat diagonal to the fence with the test
site. With this angle, the EUT end will be closer to the fence than the
antenna. I can also change the chain link fence to a wooden fence, but this
fence is built on top of a 2 foot concrete retaining
Does anyone know what is going on with the final word on EN 55022:1998 plus
A1:2000? Is it still going into effect in August 2003?
The new amendment calls out for ferrite tubes on all power cables and I/O
cables exiting the test site. The problem I'm finding is that the FCC will
not accept this
you believe are not supported?
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International
From: emcp...@aol.com [mailto:emcp...@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:00 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Agilent 6842A
I think all of the people that own the Agilent 6842A Harmonic
I think all of the people that own the Agilent 6842A Harmonic and Flicker Test
System should get together and request Agilent to update their software for
the new standards. As a loyal HP/Agilent customer, I would expect them to
take care of this issue. This is why we buy certain brands of test
Hello Group,
I have some questions about the harmonic/flicker standards. I would
appreciate any input you have.
1. What are the differences between EN 61000-3-2:1995 plus A1:1998, A2:1998,
A14:2000 and the new standard EN 61000-3-2:2000?
2. What are the differences between EN 61000-3-3:1995
7 matches
Mail list logo
