In message <20110714081524.45...@gmx.com>, dated Thu, 14 Jul 2011,
Anthony Thomson writes:
> EN 60065 applies to mains (non-portable equipment) as defined in cl.
>1.1.1., Scope. It also applies to equipment powered by other means but
>that’s outside the scope of this discussion.
>
>
> Cl. 3.1,
al Message -
From: John Woodgate
Sent: 07/13/11 06:09 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN50332-2
In message
,
dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011, "McInturff, Gary"
writes:
An important distinction, thanks John
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 10:10 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN50332-2
In message
,
dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011, "McInturff, Gary"
writes:
In message
,
dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011, "McInturff, Gary"
writes:
>I'd check the referenced standards to see if EN60065 is called out in
>the main standard as well.
EN 60065 calls up EN 50332-1 and -2, but only for products within their
scopes, of course.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.
In message
<5cd28539512e3142abbfd0ecbebbf50108b4d57...@hicgwsex01.ad.harman.com>,
dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011, "Huang, Tim" writes:
>TUV-SUD China is verifying our product(which is only powered by AC
>mains) according to IEC60065 and EN60065, they don't have the
>certification move on since they f
The wording in the standard at the
time said ."Warning replace with...", or equivalent wording. Heavy sigh!
It is an uphill battle but not a forgone conclusion.
-Original Message-
From: Huang, Tim [mailto:tim.hu...@harman.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 12:23 AM
To: EMC-PST
that it is must to meet comply with EN50332-2 for the headphone port.
How could I persuade them to move on?
Regards
Tim
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 3:04 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN50
7 matches
Mail list logo
