Given that is is a magnetic field immunity test, I would guess that any ferrous
metal that would affect/distort the magnetic field would not be desired. I
would be willing to bet that the standards people had that in mind, and meant
that any magnetic metal should not be used.
Also note that th
Hi John,
Yes I agree it's open to interpretation Can anyone on the list that
partook please give me insight?
Thank you!
Derek.
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate
To: EMC-PSTC
Sent: Tue, Jun 5, 2012 11:11 am
Subject: Re: EN61000-4-8
In message <8cf1146b86de5cb-1a0c-d..
In message <8cf1146b86de5cb-1a0c-d...@webmail-stg-d14.sysops.aol.com>,
dated Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Derek Walton writes:
So, does this mean that magnetic metals can be used if they are over
0.65 mm?
It's just not clear. Perhaps someone who was involved in writing the
standard can help.
--
OOO -
It sounds as if they are saying other non-magnetic metals, such as brass.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Derek Walton
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:26:32 -0400 (EDT)
To:
Subject: EN61000-4-8
Folks,
I have a question about Section 7.2 of this document. Specifically, what
metal is permis
Folks,
I have a question about Section 7.2 of this document. Specifically, what metal
is permissible for use as a GRP.
The wording of the standard is:
"The ground plane shall be a non-magnet metal sheet ( copper or aluminum ) of
0.25 mm minimum thickness; other metals may be used but in thi
5 matches
Mail list logo
