Re: [PSES] IEC 61010-1 Table K.17

/2012_04_27/IEEE%20PSES%20April/TC108%20hf_FC_v.1.2_IEEE%20PSES%20TAI.pdf Best regards, Rich -- Original Message -- From: Doug Powell doug...@gmail.com To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] IEC 61010-1 Table K.17 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:47:28 -0600 All, I am

Re: [PSES] IEC 61010-1 Table K.17

Message -- From: Doug Powell doug...@gmail.com To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] IEC 61010-1 Table K.17 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:47:28 -0600 All, I am evaluating spacings for an RF product that operates at 13.56 MHz and can produce maximum voltages of 5,000 Vrms (7,070 Vpk

Re: [PSES] IEC 61010-1 Table K.17

-- Original Message -- From: Doug Powell doug...@gmail.com mailto:doug...@gmail.com To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] IEC 61010-1 Table K.17 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:47:28 -0600 All, I am evaluating spacings for an RF product that operates

[PSES] IEC 61010-1 Table K.17

All, I am evaluating spacings for an RF product that operates at 13.56 MHz and can produce maximum voltages of 5,000 Vrms (7,070 Vpk). If I do an interpolation of using Table 6 (Mains 230 V, OV Cat II, indexing on 5,000 Vrms), I get a minimum clearance requirement of 14.9 mm. When I do the