It never seizes to amaze me the amount and depth of knowledge this group
holds. Even though the future plan of the LVD was not the original topic,
all of your responses on this subject were very informative.
Again, thank you,
David Cereceres
Safety Engineer
Pelco
This message is from the IEEE
John,
Ah! but there is such a thing as information overload!
Richard
From: john.al...@era.co.uk [mailto:john.al...@era.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:20 PM
To: richhug...@aol.com; nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE without LVD?
Richard
[mailto:richhug...@aol.com]
Sent: 30 June 2003 13:22
To: john.al...@era.co.uk; nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE without LVD?
John,
If proof were needed that one branch of the Commission doesn't know what the
other branch is doing then [COM(2003) 252 Final
John,
If proof were needed that one branch of the Commission doesn't know what the
other branch is doing then [COM(2003) 252 Final, of 12 May 2003] is it.
All I can say is that many times now I have sat in rooms in Brussels with the
European Commission; the DTI and their counterparts in other
I read in !emc-pstc that drcuthb...@micron.com wrote (in E6F64B42266D6
54b80a0f7f4b98212a50ec...@ntxboimbx03.micron.com) about 'CE without
LVD?' on Fri, 27 Jun 2003:
Yes I once had a device that was SELV and this caused some confusion. We
designed it to meet EN61010 as it was a piece of lab
!
Richard Hughes
Safety Answers Ltd.
From: nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk
[mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:43 PM
To: dcerece...@pelco.com
Cc: ri...@sdd.hp.com; david.gelf...@memotec.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE without LVD?
The removal
The removal of the lower voltage limits from the definition of the
LVD scope is not yet a 'done deal'. In particular, the official UK
position is that the costs to industry which would result from this
change would outweigh the benefits and so our current position (as of
30 May 2003) is that
Hi David:
In regards to your suggestions below, would it not be wise to take into
consideration the future plans of the LVD?
The original question was specific to the LVD.
My response was specific to the LVD.
You raise a new question with regard to a future
EU directive, the
I also heard the future incarnation of the LVD will start at
0V
From: Cereceres, David [mailto:dcerece...@pelco.com]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:27 PM
To: 'Rich Nute'; david.gelf...@memotec.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE without LVD?
Mr. Nute
: Rich Nute [mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:00 AM
To: david.gelf...@memotec.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:Re: CE without LVD?
Hi David:
It is being suggested that this product does not need safety testing and
does not need
Hello David,
Your issue is not new. I have been in a similar situation where the same
argument was made for a product powered by SELV. However, EN 60950
addresses other safety issues with products other than electrically caused
fire and electrical shock. One needs to also address the
I read in !emc-pstc that David Gelfand david.gelf...@memotec.com wrote
(in db3b83f22a576e41983ea8bfa15af2f30577d...@mtlex01.nexxlink.int)
about 'CE without LVD?' on Fri, 27 Jun 2003:
A ITE product (not ours!) is powered by an CE marked external ac-dc power
supply and has only SELV ports. I
directive.
Amund, Oslo/Norway
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]På vegne av David Gelfand
Sendt: 27. juni 2003 16:20
Til: EMC List
Emne: CE without LVD?
Hello Group,
A ITE product (not ours!) is powered
...@memotec.com]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:20 AM
To: EMC List
Subject: CE without LVD?
Hello Group,
A ITE product (not ours!) is powered by an CE marked external ac-dc power
supply and has only SELV ports. I believe this product must be tested to EN
60950, and that in the CE Declaration
Hi David:
It is being suggested that this product does not need safety testing and
does not need to include the reference to EN 60950 and the LVD in the CE
DoC, since it is SELV circuits only.
The LVD applies to products with voltage ratings
between 50 and 1000 V ac and between
Hello Group,
A ITE product (not ours!) is powered by an CE marked external ac-dc power
supply and has only SELV ports. I believe this product must be tested to EN
60950, and that in the CE Declaration of Conformity it must declare
conformity to the LVD via EN 60590.
It is being suggested
16 matches
Mail list logo
