,
Scott Mee
Johnson Controls Inc.
Automotive Systems Group
EMC Product Compliance
616.394.2565
scott@jci.com
(See attached file: CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions.ZIP)
(See attached file: CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions.zip)
Title: CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions (Current Method)
All,
One of
I read in !emc-pstc that Ralph McDiarmid
wrote (in <67C475A5ECE7D4118AEC0002B325CAB60581A5EF@BCMAIL1>) about
'CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions (Current Method)' on Fri, 19 Dec 2003:
>In terms of power change in the system as a fuction of resistance (or scalor
>of impedan
n Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: December 18, 2003 2:58 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions (Current Method)
I read in !emc-pstc that scott@jci.com wrote (in
)
about 'CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions (Current Method)' on Thu,
Works for me.
> From: John Woodgate
> Reply-To: John Woodgate
> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:29:14 +
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions (Current Method)
>
>
> I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor wrote
> (in ) about
t; > Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:58:02 +
> > To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> > Subject: Re: CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions (Current Method)
> >
> >
> > I read in !emc-pstc that scott....@jci.com wrote (in
> > )
> > about 'CISPR 25 Conducted Emission
I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor wrote
(in ) about 'CISPR 25
Conducted Emissions (Current Method)' on Thu, 18 Dec 2003:
>It is true that the unit dB Ohm has to be interpreted in context.
>However that does not change its utility. Current probe transfer
>impedance and
probe transfer impedance from the
manufacturer's curve. End of story.
> From: scott@jci.com
> Reply-To: scott@jci.com
> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:48:45 -0500
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions (Current Method)
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:58:02 +
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions (Current Method)
>
>
> I read in !emc-pstc that scott@jci.com wrote (in
> )
> about 'CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions (Current Method)' on Thu, 18
I read in !emc-pstc that scott@jci.com wrote (in
)
about 'CISPR 25 Conducted Emissions (Current Method)' on Thu, 18 Dec
2003:
>Please read the attached document that he assembled for the details.
Not relevant to the question, but I'm very disappointed to see
'dB(ohm)
9 matches
Mail list logo