...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:54 PM
Subject: RE: Fw, Yahoo Groups Recommendation?: Changes to IEEE emc-pstc
web-based services...
Pardon me if this has been decided already but I think you need to be
made aware of this.
Our corporate net nanny has blocked access to all Yahoo accounts
for the New Year!
Rich
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[ mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Gordon,Ian
Sent: January 2, 2003 6:20 AM
To: 'Luke Turnbull'
Cc: 'IEEE EMC-PSTC GROUP'
Subject: RE: Changes to IEEE emc-pstc web-based services
Luke
I sympathise with people
I read in !emc-pstc that Bill Lyons b...@lyons.demon.co.uk wrote (in
97...@lyons.demon.co.uk) about 'Changes to IEEE emc-pstc web-based
services' on Thu, 2 Jan 2003:
As an alternative, if sadly EMC-PSTC does go this retrograde way, we
could all simply move to the sci.engr.electrical.compliance
This won't work. If you want to look at how badly online forums work, look at
the IEE website.
Maybe one of the group can set up a list server elsewhere if the IEEE is sure
it wants to stop the service.
Luke Turnbull.
Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com 12/31/02 06:19pm
Effective today, we are
I shall be sorry to lose access to the daily interchange among the EMC
professionals who've made this list worth subscribing to. Provision of a
link in e-mails is not even a poor substitute for those of us who wish to
use off-line readers. This is reminiscent, in its own inexorable way, to
the
www.regulatory-compliance.com
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Pommerenke, David
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 8:55 AM
To: John Woodgate; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Changes to IEEE emc-pstc web-based services
Dear
Without the list server, you will lose a massive following. This includes
myself.
Tony Nikolassy
T-Tech Engineering Labs
John has succinctly summed up the
situation that many of us find ourselves in.
It is a shame that the internet community is
being divided into the haves and
havenots (broadband vs. dial up).
I for one refuse to be forced to upgrade
to broadband from my very satisfactory
$7.50/month current
Dear Group,
My experience is that with WEB-based systems there will be significantly
less participation. Posting of large documents, as people will not
carefully think about file size, compression down-sampling etc will make
it worse for people on dial-up connections. Discussions will be based
In message 44+byya84qe+e...@jmwa.demon.co.uk John Woodgate writes:
It seems to me that the web site system is OK for people with 'always-
on' connection, but for those of us on dial-up, especially pay-as-you-go
dial up, it will be too expensive to justify participation.
I strongly support
I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in SR-
547...@ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com) about 'Changes to IEEE emc-pstc web-
based services' on Tue, 31 Dec 2002:
To the extent that we can, we'd
like to move our activity to the web rather than use the
listserver.
It seems
11 matches
Mail list logo
