Posted for: Chris Duprés [chris_dup...@compuserve.com]
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Duprés [SMTP:chris_dup...@compuserve.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 1999 12:21 AM
> To: Price, Ed
> Subject: FW: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?
>
>
: 'Allan G. Carr'
Cc: 'Price, Ed' ;
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 1999 6:05 AM
Subject: RE: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?
>
> Alan,
>
> As far as the quotation is concerned, I would refer you to the words in
Reg.
> 40(2)(c), Erg 57(2)(c), Erg 70(2)(c) for clauses detail
-
> From: Allan G. Carr [SMTP:e...@acarr.demon.co.uk]
> Sent: 25 November 1999 13:43
> To: Martin Green
> Cc: 'Price, Ed'; 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
> Subject: Re: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?
>
> Martin
>
> Thanks for the comprehensive r
ey are selling correctly certified
>equipment. Ignorance is no defence in law!
>
>For those who managed to read to the end of this I hope it answers some of
>the questions you may have. There are always silly exceptions to the rules,
>as with the machinery directive - but
November 1999 19:46
> To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
> Cc: 'al...@acarr.demon.co.uk'
> Subject: FW: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?
>
>
> Posted for: al...@acarr.demon.co.uk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
Posted for: al...@acarr.demon.co.uk
> -Original Message-
> From: Allan G. Carr [SMTP:al...@acarr.demon.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 7:14 AM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?
>
> Chris
>
> I
I agree this is a good question, and have been following this with interest to
see what crops up. One point worth making is that the DoC signatory is legally
responsible under criminal law. Signing a DoC fraudulently claiming compliance
is a criminal offence and such criminal liability cannot be
I always thought that the signatory of these type of documents was
signing as a representative of the corporation. I think some documents
require that an "officer of the company" sign for this reason. They
are assumed to be authorized to represent the corporation.
--
Dear Scott:
The product gets through, not based on your personal
representation, but rather on the company's representation. Because
companies are made up of living, breathing human beings, a company's
representation always takes the form the signature of a living,
breathing human being
ot then guarantee the continued compliance of the product!
"Think about it" if you don't have the control procedures - or even if
you do but don't enforce them properly!!
Regards
John Allen
Racal
--
From: Scott Douglas[SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com]
Sent: 11 November 19
er 1999 16:16
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: D of C - Who Signs?
Hello!
Forgive me for asking a possibly dumb question but here goes:
If the EU Declaration of Conformity is signed by a
responsible/technically competent person who has been nominated on
beh
-- Forwarded Message --
From: Chris Duprés, 100014,3703
TO: "Tony Reynolds", INTERNET:reyno...@pb.com
DATE: 11/11/99 20:31
RE: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?
Hi Tony.
You asked...
< In other words is it acceptable to issue D of C's to
supplie
pinions expressed being my
own and not necessarily those of my employer applies.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Douglas [mailto:s_doug...@ecrm.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 1:37 PM
To: john.al...@rdel.co.uk; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: D of C - Who Signs?
John,
Good that you
Manager
> Racal Defence Electronics Ltd
> Bracknell
> UK
>
> --
> From: Scott Douglas[SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com]
> Sent: 11 November 1999 13:39
> To: reyno...@pb.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject:RE: D of C - Who Signs?
>
> The DoC must be re-sig
--
From: john.al...@rdel.co.uk [mailto:john.al...@rdel.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 11:55 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: D of C - Who Signs?
Importance: Low
Hi Folks
I disagree strongly with Scott's assessment that the DoC has to be
resigned
for several very important and pragma
- Dallas
> -Original Message-
> From: John Allen [SMTP:john.al...@rdel.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 10:55 AM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: D of C - Who Signs?
>
>
> Hi Folks
>
> I disagree strongly with Scott's assessment that
crm.com]
Sent: 11 November 1999 13:39
To: reyno...@pb.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:RE: D of C - Who Signs?
The DoC must be re-signed.
Scott
s_doug...@ecrm.com
ECRM Incorporated
Tewksbury, MA USA
-Original Message-
From: reyno...@pb.com [mailto:reyno...@pb.com]
Sent:
k the contract simply by firing the person who
signed it. Right? It is the same concept.
Brian Kunde
- Original Message -
From: Tony Reynolds
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 10:15 AM
Subject: D of C - Who Signs?
Hello!
Forgive me for asking a possibly dumb questio
The DoC must be re-signed.
Scott
s_doug...@ecrm.com
ECRM Incorporated
Tewksbury, MA USA
-Original Message-
From: reyno...@pb.com [mailto:reyno...@pb.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 10:16 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: D of C - Who Signs?
Importance: Low
Hello
Hello!
Forgive me for asking a possibly dumb question but here goes:
If the EU Declaration of Conformity is signed by a
responsible/technically competent person who has been nominated on
behalf of the company's Directors and then that person leaves the
20 matches
Mail list logo
