In message c251421d09afa042bc6cce2e86ebc9470153f...@egor.keytek.com,
dated Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Mike Hopkins michael.hopk...@thermo.com writes
You can buy them directly from the IEC website www.iec.ch -- or
ANSI's site
No, A11 is the code for a CENELEC-only amendment, so IEC won't have
In message d84b720efa9e154091f4b86ab58fc1a0040...@itlltd02.itl.local,
dated Tue, 21 Feb 2006, itl-emc user group itl-...@itl.co.il writes
Does anyone know where I can purchase (preferably by download) the
subject amendments?
You cannot buy them directly from CENELEC. You can buy them from
Mobile: +1 603 765 3736
michael.hopk...@thermo.com
www.thermo.com/esd
_
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of itl-emc user
group
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:03 AM
To: Emc-Pstc Group (E-mail 2)
Subject: Amendment A2: 2005 to EN 61000-3-2: 2000; Amendment
Dear all,
Does anyone know where I can purchase (preferably by download) the subject
amendments?
Thanks in advance for any help
Regards
David Shidlowsky
Technical Writer
EMC Laboratory
ITL (Product Testing) Ltd.
Kfar Bin Nun
Israel
Tel: +972-8-9797799
Fax: +972-8-9797702
Email:
I read in !emc-pstc that lfresea...@aol.com wrote (in 112.2b04c6d2.2ce2
6...@aol.com) about 'EN 61000-3-2:2000' on Tue, 11 Nov 2003:
EMC does not have a defined frequency range.
Well, there is a general upper bound of 400 GHz, but it's just
conventional. When terahertz technology
In a message dated 11/10/2003 2:34:28 PM Central Standard Time,
ralph.mcdiar...@xantrex.com writes:
Some have questioned whether 61000-3-2 is even an EMC standard!
Why would it not be.
In 25 years of working in EMC, I've seen EMC issues from DC to daylight...
Just because PC's are
I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan Christopher [Soundcraft UK] Christopher
.col...@soundcraft.com wrote (in 8B639EA607AFD311901D00062938706307102
782@SCFTUKX1) about 'EN 61000-3-2:2000' on Tue, 11 Nov 2003:
I think we are in agreement that conformity to EN61000-3-2 is required
for a mains powered
I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in
20030043.qaa01...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'EN 61000-3-2:2000' on
Mon, 10 Nov 2003:
The standard was written and promulgated to the IEC by a European
committee
No, it was developed in IEC SC77A/WG1, which had experts from all
I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in
200311102309.paa01...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'EN 61000-3-2:2000' on
Mon, 10 Nov 2003:
Hi John:
Some have questioned whether 61000-3-2 is even an EMC standard!
If not, what do you think it is?
I fall into the group
:
owner-emc-pstc@majordo Subject: RE: EN
61000-3-2:2000
mo.ieee.org
:
owner-emc-pstc@majordo Subject: RE: EN
61000-3-2:2000
mo.ieee.org
Christopher [Soundcraft UK]
[mailto:christopher.col...@soundcraft.com]
Sent: 11 November 2003 10:14
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN 61000-3-2:2000
I think we are in agreement that conformity to EN61000-3-2 is required for a
mains powered product to comply with the EMC Directive (using
...@solid-state-logic.com]
Sent: 11 November 2003 11:13
To: Colgan Christopher [Soundcraft UK]; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN 61000-3-2:2000
Original Message
On 11/11/2003, 10:14:18, Colgan Christopher [Soundcraft UK]
christopher.col...@soundcraft.com wrote regarding RE: EN 61000-3-2
Original Message
On 11/11/2003, 10:14:18, Colgan Christopher [Soundcraft UK]
christopher.col...@soundcraft.com wrote regarding RE: EN 61000-3-2:2000:
I think we are in agreement that conformity to EN61000-3-2 is required
for a
mains powered product to comply with the EMC Directive
I think we are in agreement that conformity to EN61000-3-2 is required for a
mains powered product to comply with the EMC Directive (using the standards
route).
What puzzles me is, why does EN55103-1 (pro audio emissions) call up
EN61000-3-2? Surely there is no need for the standard to do this?
Hi Josh:
This standard has been adopted by China and Japan. Japan has added a
source impedance for the test setup, but it implies to me that this is a
world-wide issue.
The question I was attempting to answer was
John's question if 61000-3-2 is not an EMC
standard, then what kind of a
...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: EN 61000-3-2:2000
Hi John:
Some have questioned whether 61000-3-2 is even an EMC standard!
If not, what do you think it is?
I fall into the group that question whether 61000-3-2
is an EMC -- Electo-Magnetic Compatibility -- standard.
The objective
Hi John:
Some have questioned whether 61000-3-2 is even an EMC standard!
If not, what do you think it is?
I fall into the group that question whether 61000-3-2
is an EMC -- Electo-Magnetic Compatibility -- standard.
The objective is to prevent reduction of peak voltage
on the
I read in !emc-pstc that Ralph McDiarmid ralph.mcdiar...@xantrex.com
wrote (in 67C475A5ECE7D4118AEC0002B325CAB60581A413@BCMAIL1) about 'EN
61000-3-2:2000' on Mon, 10 Nov 2003:
IMO, if such an interpretation is not forthcoming then it shall be left
to the manufacturers to interprete it and state
[mailto:jde...@nas.com]
Sent: November 9, 2003 9:36 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; John Woodgate
Cc: Harry Hodes; j...@acmetesting.com; br...@acmetesting.com
Subject: RE: EN 61000-3-2:2000
John:
The question about whether the intent of the writers (of EN 61000-3-2:2000)
was to require
I read in !emc-pstc that Jim Ericson jde...@nas.com wrote (in
gaeajkfnhcahabpifcimiecacbaa.jde...@nas.com) about 'EN 61000-3-2:2000'
on Sun, 9 Nov 2003:
The question about whether the intent of the writers (of EN
61000-3-2:2000) was to require a double repeatability test for each
EUT tested
John:
The question about whether the intent of the writers (of EN 61000-3-2:2000)
was to require a double repeatability test for each EUT tested, or whether
the intent was simply to demonstrate a process qualification has been
touched on in this forum for over two years.
It is now November 2003
I read in !emc-pstc that Jon Francis jfran...@voltech.co.uk wrote (in
5bc8a2628bc2eb4081ca71b2d6717d3a05e...@voltech-uk.voltech.co.uk) about
'EN 61000-3-2:2000' on Fri, 7 Nov 2003:
Are there any official clarifications available concerning the
repeatability test?
No, because
Are there any official clarifications available concerning the repeatability
test?
Regards,
Jon Francis
www.voltech.com
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 14 September, 2002 8:09 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: EN 61000-3-2:2000
I read in !emc
I read in !emc-pstc that rehel...@mmm.com wrote (in
ofd47a064b.f63246cb-on86256c32.00321...@mmm.com) about 'EN
61000-3-2:2000' on Thu, 12 Sep 2002:
Clause 6.2.3.1 (page 13) of the above standard talks about repeatability.
Does this mean that the harmonic tests must be repeated a certain numbers
Clause 6.2.3.1 (page 13) of the above standard talks about repeatability.
Does this mean that the harmonic tests must be repeated a certain numbers
of times or is repeatability used to determine or shorten the test
observation period?
Also in Table Z1 (clause 6.2.4, page 14), what is the type of
26 matches
Mail list logo
