ee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] Namens Pawson, James
Verzonden: Monday, August 15, 2011 4:05 PM
Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: EN 61000-4-2 ESD - Horizontal distance from HCP to test chamber
walls
I've found specifications in the EN 61000-4-2:2009 ESD standard for
* HCP
I've found specifications in the EN 61000-4-2:2009 ESD standard for
* HCP size (1.6m x 0.8m)
* Distance between EUT and walls of chamber (0.8m)
* Height of HCP above GRP (0.8m)
But there is nothing that I've seen (in pictures or words) that shows distance
>from HCP to the
Hi all
Can someone describe the main changes in the new ESD standard EN 61000-4-2:
2009 compared to the 1995 version with amendments?
Best regards,
Mr. Kim Boll Jensen
Bolls Rådgivning
Ved Gadekæret 11F
DK-3660 Stenløse
Phone: +45 48 18 35 66
k...@bolls.dk
www.bolls.dk
2nd ED of 60601-1-2 it will be 8
> kV
> air and 6 kV contact.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Sandy Mazzola
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 2:
Hi Sandy,
I haven't heard of an increase in the requirements of EN 61000-4-2. In
any event, if there was an increase, it would be interesting to note;
but it shouldn't affect your compliance testing for Europe.
Before I go any further, I want to say that there is an exception to
al Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Jim Conrad
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:16 PM
To: Sandy Mazzola; emc-p...@ieee.org; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN 61000-4-2 ESD Requirements
Hi Santo,
You didn't say what t
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Sandy Mazzola
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 2:21 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: EN 61000-4-2 ESD Requirements
Members,
Is there anyone who can let me know the status of any forthcoming
increase in the EN 61000-4-2 ESD requiremen
Members,
Is there anyone who can let me know the status of any forthcoming
increase in the EN 61000-4-2 ESD requirements of +/- 8 Kv air and +/- 4 Kv
contact.
Also any editorial comment on whether the current requirements are realistic
would also be appreciated.
Thanks
Have a
rg
Subject: RE: EN 61000-4-2
Bill,
We have found that stepping up through the test voltages can give misleading
results. Our products are plastic cased, and they appear to 'charge' as the
test voltages are applied. The result is a pass if 10kv (for example) is
applied by stepping in 2
test.
- Robert -
-Original Message-
From: rehel...@mmm.com
To: carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com ;
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 6:16 AM
Subject: RE: EN 61000-4-2
>
>
>
>You are perhaps applyi
, Bill
Cc: 'kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com' ;
emc-p...@ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 12:55 AM
Subject: RE: EN 61000-4-2
>
>Bill,
>
>We have found that stepping up through the test voltages can give
misleading
>results. Our prod
1:14:12 AM
Please respond to carlos.perk...@eu.effem.com
To: "Jacowleff, Bill"
cc: "'kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com'"
emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Subject: RE: EN 61000-4-2
Bill,
We have found that stepping up through the t
10:41
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: EN 61000-4-2
>
>
> Dear all
>
> I'm writing on a internal testprocedure for our products, and have now
> come to
> EN 61000-4-2 ESD. What confuse me is that the standard (as I read it) only
> refere to 10 discharg
-- Forwarded by Kim Boll Jensen/INT on 2000-01-18 08:28
---
Helge Knudsen on 2000-01-17 19:11:53
Please respond to "hknud...@image.dk"
To: Kim Boll Jensen/INT
cc:
Subject: RE: EN 61000-4-2
I will just forward this answer since t
if 10kv is applied directly.
Perhaps both methods should be used?
Cheers,
Carlos.
Please respond to "Jacowleff, Bill"
To: "'kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com'" ,
emc-p...@ieee.org
cc: (bcc: Carlos A. Perkins/WIN/Effem)
From: "Jacowleff, Bill"
ts at each of the designated discharge points is the minimum.
Mike Hopkins
> -Original Message-
> From: kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com [SMTP:kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 5:41 AM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: EN 61000-4-2
>
>
&
...@vdo.com
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Lister [mailto:geoff.lis...@motionmedia.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 12:19 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN 61000-4-2
EN55024 specifies 50 contact discharges at each conductive test point
and 10 air discharges for each slot
ne
tests.
Good Luck!
-Original Message-
From: Jacowleff, Bill [mailto:bjacowl...@vdo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 7:43 AM
To: 'kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN 61000-4-2
Dear Mr. Kim Boll Jensen:
Well the answer to your question is 10 discharges
ems
> Airpax Instruments
> 150 Knotter Drive
> Cheshire, CT 06410
> Phone: 203 271-6394
> FAX:203 271-6200
> bjacowl...@vdo.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com [mailto:kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com]
> Sent: Monday, Januar
...@ieee.org
Subject: EN 61000-4-2
Dear all
I'm writing on a internal testprocedure for our products, and have now come
to
EN 61000-4-2 ESD. What confuse me is that the standard (as I read it) only
refere to 10 discharges at each point (and each polarity), but I have been
told
from several diff
...@lasat.com [SMTP:kim.boll.jen...@lasat.com]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 5:41 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: EN 61000-4-2
Dear all
I'm writing on a internal testprocedure for our products, and have
now come to
EN 61000-4-2 ESD. What confuse
Dear all
I'm writing on a internal testprocedure for our products, and have now come to
EN 61000-4-2 ESD. What confuse me is that the standard (as I read it) only
refere to 10 discharges at each point (and each polarity), but I have been told
from several different persons that the right n
>During a quality inspection in my lab the inspector
>I've got a non-conformity due to the lack of resistivity check on the
>470 Kohm resistor employed to connect the reference plane of the ESD table
>to the ground.
>This is required according to EN 61000-4-2
>Could anyon
The "standard" anti ESD wrist strap used by electronic assemblers etc. to
avoid electrostatic build-up on their bodies also has a resistance of about
that value (1 Mohm) to ground.)
This resistance value is chosen as a compromise to be both low enough to
prevent ESD build up, but also to be high e
Original Message-
From: Rossi Giuseppe [SMTP:g.ro...@crf.it]
<mailto:[SMTP:g.ro...@crf.it]>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 9:09 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
<mailto:emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org>
Subject:ESD EN 61000-4-2 que
During a quality inspection in my lab the inspector
I've got a non-conformity due to the lack of resistivity check on the
470 Kohm resistor employed to connect the reference plane of the ESD table
to the ground.
This is required according to EN 61000-4-2
Could anyone give me some hin
26 matches
Mail list logo
