-)
Ed
From: "Brumbaugh, David"
Subject: RE: MIL-STD-461 C vs D
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:02:10 -0800
To: 'emc-pstc' , "'ed.pr...@cubic.com'"
> As I understand it, 461E will simply merge 461 and 462 into a single
> interface stand
From: Anthony Guinto
Subject: Re: MIL-STD-461 C vs D
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 13:51:23 -0800
To: "Brumbaugh, David" , 'emc-pstc'
> Hello
>
> Here is the basics on 461D
>
> MIL-STD-461 D
> EMI
> CE101 replaces CE01
&
As I understand it, 461E will simply merge 461 and 462 into a single interface
standard. There is no plan to change the requirements or test methods unless
there is a very compelling reason to do so.
DB
> All those still studying 461D/462D will be very happy to know that drafts of
> 461E are
From: "Brumbaugh, David"
Subject: MIL-STD-461 C vs D
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 07:34:44 -0800
To: 'emc-pstc'
> Hi group,
> Here's one for all of you that make products for US military/gov't
> customers:
>
> I was
Hello
Here is the basics on 461D
MIL-STD-461 D
EMI
CE101 replaces CE01
CE102 up to 10MHz No Narrow or Wide band only Peak Band.
CE03 test is gone
CE07 test is gone
CS101 replaces CS01
CS02 test is gone
CS06 test is gone
CS114 Bulk Current Injection is combo replacement of CS02 whole sprectrum
&
Hi group,
Here's one for all of you that make products for US military/gov't
customers:
I was reviewing MIL-STD-461D (I know, a little late to be commenting at this
point) and I noticed that although CS101 in -461D corresponds to CS01 in
-461C, there is no counterpart to -461C's CS02 requirement.
6 matches
Mail list logo
