cs EMC Is Our Specialty
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
david.cole...@selex-comms.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:07 AM
To: Barker, Neil; 'Powell, Doug'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject
e question as I did.
Best Regards,
Dave Coleman AIIRSM
SELEX Communications
"Barker, Neil"
01/07/2008 15:58
To
"'Powell, Doug'" , david.cole...@selex-comms.com,
emc-p...@ieee.org
cc
Subject
RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41
Also, all DEF STANs
@selex-comms.com
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:15 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41
Has anyone got (or know of) a comparison between DEFSTAN 59-41 and
MIL-STD
461 (any versions, but preferably recent), that ideally cove
All Mil-Stds are available at http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/
-doug
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
david.cole...@selex-comms.com
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:15 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: MIL-STD 461 vs
Has anyone got (or know of) a comparison between DEFSTAN 59-41 and MIL-STD 461
(any versions, but preferably recent), that ideally covers the Land Use
aspects of the standards?
I know the UK MoD will accept 461 tested equipment, but for an RFQ it is
better to respond with some technical argument
5 matches
Mail list logo