RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41

2008-07-01 Thread Price, Edward
cs EMC Is Our Specialty From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of david.cole...@selex-comms.com Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 8:07 AM To: Barker, Neil; 'Powell, Doug'; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject

RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41

2008-07-01 Thread david.coleman
e question as I did. Best Regards, Dave Coleman AIIRSM SELEX Communications "Barker, Neil" 01/07/2008 15:58 To "'Powell, Doug'" , david.cole...@selex-comms.com, emc-p...@ieee.org cc Subject RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41 Also, all DEF STANs

RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41

2008-07-01 Thread Barker, Neil
@selex-comms.com Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:15 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41 Has anyone got (or know of) a comparison between DEFSTAN 59-41 and MIL-STD 461 (any versions, but preferably recent), that ideally cove

RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41

2008-06-30 Thread Powell, Doug
All Mil-Stds are available at http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ -doug From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of david.cole...@selex-comms.com Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:15 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: MIL-STD 461 vs

MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41

2008-06-30 Thread david.coleman
Has anyone got (or know of) a comparison between DEFSTAN 59-41 and MIL-STD 461 (any versions, but preferably recent), that ideally covers the Land Use aspects of the standards? I know the UK MoD will accept 461 tested equipment, but for an RFQ it is better to respond with some technical argument