Re: Merger of Component Manufactures

1996-05-02 Thread Bayhic
Harold and PSTC Group, The OEM should be able to use the Section General method also. He should be able to add a statement, such as - "All references to Siemens and Potter and Brumfield are nterchangeable" Regards, Charlie Bayhi c.ba...@ieee.org

Re: Merger of Component Manufactures

1996-05-02 Thread Leipold, Harold
-- From: Bayhic To: LEIPOLHD; emc-pstc Subject: Re: Merger of Component Manufactures List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Wednesday, May 01, 1996 5:46PM Harold and others on PSTC - >From an end users standpoint, I think there are a couple ways of handling name changes for

RE: Merger of Component Manufactures

1996-05-01 Thread Leipold, Harold
mens.com] -- From: owner-emc-pstc To: emc-pstc Subject: Merger of Component Manufactures List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Tuesday, April 30, 1996 1:15PM For whoever's benefits, merger is not seldomly seen these days. I have a problem with it when any of the safety critic

Re: Merger of Component Manufactures

1996-05-01 Thread Bayhic
Harold and others on PSTC - >From an end users standpoint, I think there are a couple ways of handling name changes for component manufacturers, in order to keep from haveing to change every Certification Report. Not quite sure how to handle other agencies, but I believe the UL SEC GENERAL is an

Merger of Component Manufactures

1996-04-30 Thread tbao
For whoever's benefits, merger is not seldomly seen these days. I have a problem with it when any of the safety critical component manufacturers has a merger. They still manufacture the same components but the label is changed. Then we have to modify our safety reports to reflect the changes other