I find this a very interesting debate but for those that don't after
this response you should contact me off line.
I do want to make it clear that I certainly don't have the magic answer
and one should decide for themselves - just don't follow along simply because
somebody wrot
-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175
http://www.itl.co.il
http://www.i-spec.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter L. Tarver [mailto:peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:36 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE for IP Phone
All -
One point that seems
Which brings us to the odd conclusion that the only people who really
care what approvals apply are the customs officials. We should probably
be asking them what they expect since they appear pretty autonomous.
Bob Johnson
ITE Safety
-Original Message-
From: Peter L. Tarver
One point
All -
One point that seems to be missing from this discussion is
that an IP telephone looks like a telephone, acts like a
telephone and for all intents and purposes *is* a telephone,
irrespective of how *telecommunication* is transformed,
transmitted, protocol converted, stapled, spindled folded
domo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE for IP Phone
Alan,
If the device looks like a telephone and can easily be connected to the POTS
(e.g. RJ-11 or RJ-45), you can assume someone will try to connect it to the
telephone network. So due diligence means R&TTE testing and marking, if only
to wa
-
From: Richard Hughes [mailto:rehug...@nortelnetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 7:45 AM
To: 'alan.hud...@amsjv.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE for IP Phone
Alan,
_IF_ your product is covered by the R&TTED _THEN_ there is no lower voltage
limit f
Sent: 05 December 2002 10:56
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE for IP Phone
Importance: High
Richard Hughes said:
++ Moreover, since the said telephone is connected only to an SELV
Circuit then
++ it falls below the lower voltage limits of the LVD (50 Vac, 75 Vdc)
and so
++ the LVD does not appl
Richard Hughes said:
++ Moreover, since the said telephone is connected only to an SELV
Circuit then
++ it falls below the lower voltage limits of the LVD (50 Vac, 75 Vdc)
and so
++ the LVD does not apply.
I thought the RTTED referral to the LVD removed the voltage limits of
the latter? That
nions of course,
Richard Hughes
-Original Message-
From: Peter L. Tarver [mailto:peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: 04 December 2002 16:26
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: CE for IP Phone
All -
My reading of the RTTE indicates that it does indeed apply
to an IP telephone. P
en...@ktl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 10:50 AM
To: 'Ilan Cohen'; 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: RE: CE for IP Phone
***NEWSFLASH*** - KTL Launch New Website!! - Visit us at http://www.ktl.com
I think a Voice over IP is within the scope of the RTTE due t
2 801801
Fax: +44 (0) 1482 801806
-Original Message-
From: Ilan Cohen [mailto:ico...@itl.co.il]
Sent: 04 December 2002 06:16
To: 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: Peter Merguerian
Subject: RE: CE for IP Phone
I do not think that IP phone is under the RTTE
All -
My reading of the RTTE indicates that it does indeed apply
to an IP telephone. Please refer to the below, paying
particular attention to the use of "...indirectly by any
means whatsoever..."
"Article 2
"Definitions
"or the purpose of this Directive the following definitions
shall apply
ssage-
From: Ilan Cohen [mailto:ico...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:16 PM
To: 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: Peter Merguerian
Subject: RE: CE for IP Phone
I do not think that IP phone is under the RTTE directive. For a simple
reason, voltage is limite
39022, Fax 972-3-5339019
ico...@itl.co.il, website: http://www.itl.co.il
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:12 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: CE fo
I read in !emc-pstc that Peter Merguerian wrote
(in <2D1037012914D4118DB8204C4F4F50203DDE91@ITLLTD01>) about 'CE for IP
Phone' on Tue, 3 Dec 2002:
>For Europe, does an IP telephone (all SELV) having no connection to the
>telecom network fall under the RTTE Directive or just covered by the LVD and
15 matches
Mail list logo
