21:37
To: Gert Gremmen; paul_sc...@mitel.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Dwell time for Immunity under EN55024?
Gert Gremmen wrote:
...
prescan with Increase frequency step size ! (watch out for resonances)
Modify equipment to decrease fault response time (low pass filters
I read in !emc-pstc that Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote (in
oleokfnbajjejfkplbbmieoecdaa.g.grem...@cetest.nl) about 'Dwell time
for Immunity under EN55024?' on Fri, 4 Oct 2002:
Any deviation of the standard is doomed to art 10.2 , but changing an
undefined dwell
time to
]
Sent: donderdag 3 oktober 2002 21:37
To: Gert Gremmen; paul_sc...@mitel.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Dwell time for Immunity under EN55024?
Gert Gremmen wrote:
...
prescan with Increase frequency step size ! (watch out for resonances)
Modify equipment
in a reasonable
time period. This is all part of engineering, it is more than just
lock-step response to standardized test procedures.
--
From: Leslie Bai leslie_...@yahoo.com
To: Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl, paul_sc...@mitel.com,
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Dwell time for Immunity
Gert Gremmen wrote:
...
prescan with Increase frequency step size ! (watch out for resonances)
Modify equipment to decrease fault response time (low pass filters ;
software )
Build Specifc test features
Write specific test software
.
I am wondering whoelse out there doing these - Is
I read in !emc-pstc that Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote (in
oleokfnbajjejfkplbbmienmcdaa.g.grem...@cetest.nl) about 'Dwell time
for Immunity under EN55024?' on Thu, 3 Oct 2002:
The test will give you only PRESUMPTION of compliance anyway.
It is extremely misleading to cast continual
Hi Paul,
By reading your explanation it seems as if you miss the point
of what immunity testing is about.
Testing Immunity !
Your explanation makes me think you want to exercise the standard to the
letter.
That's probably not the case, but one should also take the following into
account:
7 matches
Mail list logo
