RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-17 Thread Kevin Richardson
...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of richwo...@tycoint.com Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2002 9:43 PM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1 OK, let me ask the question again. Is EN60950-1 complete enought to evaluate most ITE without the need of the subparts? Richard Woods Sensormatic

RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-16 Thread richwoods
Pickard; richwo...@tycoint.com Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1 I would agree, kind of like IEC/EN 60335 for domestic electrical and similar equipment. Brian McAuliffe MCA Compliance Solutions www.mcac.ie -Original Message- From: owner-emc-p

RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-16 Thread Kevin Richardson
:28 AM To: richwo...@tycoint.com Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1 Richard et al, It is my understanding that IEC/EN/?? 60950-1 is intended to supercede IEC/EN/?? 60950 3rd Edition. This is evidenced by the statement from CENELEC's web site relating to EN60950

RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-16 Thread Brian McAuliffe
chosen. Brian McAuliffe MCA Compliance Solutions www.mcac.ie -Original Message- From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Brian O'Connell Sent: 15 July 2002 14:25 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-16 Thread Brian McAuliffe
21:28 To: richwo...@tycoint.com Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1 Richard et al, It is my understanding that IEC/EN/?? 60950-1 is intended to supercede IEC/EN/?? 60950 3rd Edition. This is evidenced by the statement from CENELEC's web site relating to EN60950

RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-15 Thread Ron Pickard
: mo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-15 Thread richwoods
of the current edition. Richard Woods Sensormatic Electronics Tyco International -Original Message- From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:boconn...@t-yuden.com] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:25 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1 In my copy of EN 60950-1:2002

RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-15 Thread Brian O'Connell
: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1 Hi Allen, Thanks for your reply, however, I highly doubt that these products will be obsoleted by then, which is the source of my concern and my query. Also, at some standards purchasing houses, I've noticed that EN60950 3rd Edition has been, or is being, superceded

Re: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-12 Thread Ron Pickard
07/12/02 01:37 PMSubject: Re: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

Re: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-12 Thread Allen Kemevor
Ron, There is usually a few years transition followed by a a few more years grand fathering period when a new standard introduced. Your product may be obsolete by then. Allen Ron Pickard wrote: To all, I am trying to decide, not if, but to which of the above standards must be complied with

RE: EN60950 3rd vs EN60950-1

2002-07-12 Thread Peter Tarver
Ron - I do not have a view on publication of EN60950-1 in the OJ, but the IEC Web Store indicates a Technical Report Form was created in APR2002 and is available. Regards, Peter L. Tarver, PE Product Safety Manager Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services San Jose, CA peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com