Re: electrochemical potentials

2003-10-15 Thread Fred Townsend
I think you are confusing data and standards. Electrochemical potential is data that goes back over three centuries when Voltaire and others started measuring it. The first place I ever saw it published was in my father's copy of the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 19th edition. by the

Re: electrochemical potentials

2003-10-15 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that david_ster...@ademco.com wrote (in 2DF7C54A75B dd311b61700508b64231008db5...@nyhqex1.ademconet.com) about 'electrochemical potentials' on Wed, 15 Oct 2003: I am reviewing some dissimilar material combinations in an earthing path. I have reviewed a lot data available

RE: electrochemical potentials

2003-10-15 Thread Peter L. Tarver
From: David Sterner Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 5:45 AM The voltages are derived from electrochemical reaction data referenced to a hydrogen electrode at 298.15°K and 101.325 kPa. Thank you for your response, David. I am entirely uncertain that the hydrogen reference electrode was

RE: electrochemical potentials

2003-10-15 Thread david_ster...@ademco.com
The voltages are derived from electrochemical reaction data referenced to a hydrogen electrode at 298.15°K and 101.325 kPa. These are published in various references, including the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. You consider all possible reactions among the metals and decide which

RE: electrochemical potentials

2003-10-15 Thread Gregg Kervill
My physical constants reference bible was produced by Kaye and Laybe (¿sp?) Gregg

RE: electrochemical potentials

2003-10-14 Thread Peter L. Tarver
Richard - I have plans to try additional reference texts on a visit to the local university library, hopefully later this week. I started out searching for a good lookup table. Then in the research I've done so far, I discovered many of the permutations involved in test methods to determine

Re: electrochemical potentials

2003-10-14 Thread richhug...@aol.com
Peter, I understand that the origins were a US MIL spec. Although I have not checked, I seem to recall that pretty much the same information was also contained in IEC 380. We are therefore going way, way, back in the annals of time. Have you tried looking up the electro-potentials in a book of

Re: Electrochemical potentials

2002-06-08 Thread John Woodgate
1615323...@snellwilcox.com, duncan.ho...@snellwilcox.com wrote: Has anyone ever used a combination of metals not listed in annex J of EN60950 for a protective earthing connection? If so can anyone suggest a decent source of information on electrochemical potentials for various materials. The

RE: Electrochemical potentials

2002-06-07 Thread POWELL, DOUG
[mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 8:11 AM To: duncan.ho...@snellwilcox.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Electrochemical potentials Duncan, From the Galvanic Compatibility Chart in the back of Instrument Specialties (Now called Laird Technoligies) catalog

RE: Electrochemical potentials

2002-06-07 Thread Chris Maxwell
metals. We have the A version from 1972. Perhaps there is a newer one. Chris -Original Message- From: Chris Maxwell Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:11 AM To: duncan.ho...@snellwilcox.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Electrochemical potentials Duncan

RE: Electrochemical potentials

2002-06-07 Thread Chris Maxwell
Duncan, From the Galvanic Compatibility Chart in the back of Instrument Specialties (Now called Laird Technoligies) catalog. Tin plating has an anodic index of 0.6V Copper itself has an anodic index of 0.35V For tin plated copper; I would use 0.6V. Galvanized Steel (either hot dip or