RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria

2003-11-20 Thread Georgerian, Richard
Greetings All, Thank-you to all who have responded to my question on GR-1089. This group has always shown its value. Richard. -Original Message- From: Georgerian, Richard Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:34 AM To: 'IEEE emc-pstc' Subject:GR-1089 Issue 3

RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria

2003-11-19 Thread JIM WIESE
; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria Jim, Regarding your comment "And we thought GR-1089 was confusing with regard to doors open or closed requirements!" I've been working the GR 1089 authors on clarifying the open/closed do

RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria

2003-11-19 Thread Bill Rea
PM To: marko.radoji...@nokia.com; rgeorger...@carrieraccess.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria One other quick note when doing your EMC testing: All Service Providers (except Verizon) accept GR-1089-CORE issue 3. Verizon ONLY accepts

RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria

2003-11-18 Thread JIM WIESE
im.wi...@adtran.com From: marko.radoji...@nokia.com [mailto:marko.radoji...@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:59 AM To: rgeorger...@carrieraccess.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria Richard, The root of the problem may be

RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria

2003-11-18 Thread Donnelly, Thomas
not compliant with their standards. From: andy.wh...@nokia.com [mailto:andy.wh...@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:17 PM To: rgeorger...@carrieraccess.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria Hi Richard, I used to deal with

RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria

2003-11-18 Thread GARY MCINTURFF
rom: >Reply-To: >To: , >Subject: RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria >Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:58:45 -0800 > >Richard, > >The root of the problem may be that you are interpreting the requirements >as "OR" rather than "AND&qu

RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria

2003-11-18 Thread andy.wh...@nokia.com
Hi Richard, I used to deal with GR1089 testing with my previous employer. The way I used to specify the test plans were to complete the emissions tests with 'doors open' and 'doors closed'. This would allow the GR1089 criteria to be met and also the FCC criteria to be met. I know that it means repe

RE: GR-1089 Issue 3: 3.2.1 Radiated Emission Criteria

2003-11-18 Thread marko.radoji...@nokia.com
Richard, The root of the problem may be that you are interpreting the requirements as "OR" rather than "AND". GR-1089 requires you to meet R3-1 *AND* R3-2. Verizon also specifically calls out all these requirements in section 3.2.10.1 of their NEBS checklist. http://www.verizonnebs.com/index.h