...@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org]On Behalf Of drcuthb...@micron.com
Sent: Freitag, 19. November 2004 15:47
To: israe...@oms-it.co.il; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Heart pacemakers - Vulnerability to EM
I don't know what the standards call for but it is quite possible
It may be worth noting that in the medium wave broadcast band the FCC limit
is over 600 volts per meter. We don't incur inherently harmful induced body
currents with less at these frequencies -- unless we're hanging onto an
antenna.
But considering the low potentials to be measured, and the
-0700
To: israe...@oms-it.co.il, emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Heart pacemakers - Vulnerability to EM
I don't know what the standards call for but it is quite possible for a person
to be subjected to an E-field exceeding 500 V/m very near to an amateur radio
station. This is the field at my
To: 'drcuthb...@micron.com'; israe...@oms-it.co.il; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Heart pacemakers - Vulnerability to EM
I am no expert in this subject, and some of what I am about to say is
hearsay, but here it is for what it's worth.
Safety
...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Heart pacemakers - Vulnerability to EM
I am no expert in this subject, and some of what I am about to say is hearsay,
but here it is for what it's worth.
Safety levels are generally based not on field strength, but on power density.
However, these levels are set
: Heart pacemakers - Vulnerability to EM
I don't know what the standards call for but it is quite possible for a person
to be subjected to an E-field exceeding 500 V/m very near to an amateur radio
station. This is the field at my operating position when I am transmitting at
1.8 MHz. A cell phone held
I don't know what the standards call for but it is quite possible for a person
to be subjected to an E-field exceeding 500 V/m very near to an amateur radio
station. This is the field at my operating position when I am transmitting at
1.8 MHz. A cell phone held close to the body will cause a
7 matches
Mail list logo
