Re: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists

2003-03-31 Thread Ken Javor
I agree with Mr. Woodgate. Leading off with the Forrestal, without adequately explaining the failure mechanism, gives an unrealistic and misleading introduction to the subject. There was a degraded shield termination that allowed rf to couple to EED leads. For an entity whose emission challenge

RE: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists

2003-03-31 Thread Bill Morse
.ieee.org Subject: RE: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists I should reiterate from my original message that the text I posted is the introduction to an article, not a complete article. The example was included to engage the reader from the start; demonstrate th

Re: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists

2003-03-27 Thread Ken Javor
rmalization of enviromental stress testing (shock. vibration, & thermal). EMC was not, IMO, considered part of the root cause. R/S, Brian -Original Message- From: King, Richard Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:18 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Help wanted wit

RE: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists

2003-03-27 Thread boconn...@t-yuden.com
not, IMO, considered part of the root cause. R/S, Brian -Original Message- From: King, Richard Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:18 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists I should reiterate from my original mess

RE: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists

2003-03-27 Thread King, Richard
I should reiterate from my original message that the text I posted is the introduction to an article, not a complete article. The example was included to engage the reader from the start; demonstrate that electromagnetic compatibility between systems is a real-world issue; and show that a lack of

RE: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists

2003-03-27 Thread Price, Ed
>-Original Message- >From: King, Richard [mailto:richard.k...@uk.thalesgroup.com] >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:07 AM >To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org' >Subject: Help wanted with succinct subject description for >non-specialists > > > >Dear all, > >I am working on an article about EMC

RE: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists

2003-03-27 Thread King, Richard
Dear All, Many thanks for your collective help with this question. I attach my final text below in case others on the list have a use for it. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) In 1967 off the coast of Vietnam, a jet landing on the aircraft carrier U.S.S. Forrestal was briefly illuminated by

Re: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists

2003-03-27 Thread robert Macy
To me, all this regulation can be synopsized: Electronics shall not put out stuff - conducted or radiated Electronics shall not be upset when stuff comes in - susceptibility to conducted or radiated. Difference in attitude between US and elsewhere: It is my understanding that in the US th

RE: Help wanted with succinct subject description for non-special ists

2003-03-25 Thread Price, Ed
>-Original Message- >From: C N [mailto:abx...@hotmail.com] >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:48 PM >To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >Subject: Re: Help wanted with succinct subject description for >non-specialists > > > >For non-technical people ... in other words KISS. > >>EMC is two thing