Rif: Re: MIL-STD 461 C

2003-06-12 Thread Paolo Peruzzi
thank you to everybody who replied me on the forum and off-list. Now I have the standard I was looking for. Paolo ** Paolo Peruzzi Esaote S.p.A. Research & Product Development - Design Quality Control via di Caciolle, 15 I- 50127 Florence te

Re: MIL-STD 461 C

2003-06-12 Thread Ken Javor
www.emccompliance.com on 6/12/03 9:26 AM, Paolo Peruzzi at paolo.peru...@esaote.com wrote: > > > > > > Dear group, > I would like to get the old broadband and narrowband RE limit tables of the > superseded MIL STD 461C, for teaching purposes. > Could anybody tell me where to find a pdf of t

RE: MIL-STD 461 C

2003-06-12 Thread Price, Ed
>-Original Message- >From: Paolo Peruzzi [ mailto:paolo.peru...@esaote.com] >Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:27 AM >To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >Subject: MIL-STD 461 C > > > > > > > >Dear group, >I would like to get the old broadband and narrowband RE limit >tables of th

RE: MIL-STD-461 C vs D

1998-12-11 Thread ed . price
-) Ed From: "Brumbaugh, David" Subject: RE: MIL-STD-461 C vs D Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:02:10 -0800 To: 'emc-pstc' , "'ed.pr...@cubic.com'" > As I understand it, 461E will simply merge 461 and 462 into a single > interface stand

Re: MIL-STD-461 C vs D

1998-12-11 Thread ed . price
From: Anthony Guinto Subject: Re: MIL-STD-461 C vs D Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 13:51:23 -0800 To: "Brumbaugh, David" , 'emc-pstc' > Hello > > Here is the basics on 461D > > MIL-STD-461 D > EMI > CE101 replaces CE01 &

RE: MIL-STD-461 C vs D

1998-12-11 Thread Brumbaugh, David
As I understand it, 461E will simply merge 461 and 462 into a single interface standard. There is no plan to change the requirements or test methods unless there is a very compelling reason to do so. DB > All those still studying 461D/462D will be very happy to know that drafts of > 461E are

Re: MIL-STD-461 C vs D

1998-12-11 Thread ed . price
From: "Brumbaugh, David" Subject: MIL-STD-461 C vs D Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 07:34:44 -0800 To: 'emc-pstc' > Hi group, > Here's one for all of you that make products for US military/gov't > customers: > > I was reviewing MIL-STD-461D (I know, a little late t

Re: MIL-STD-461 C vs D

1998-12-10 Thread Anthony Guinto
Hello Here is the basics on 461D MIL-STD-461 D EMI CE101 replaces CE01 CE102 up to 10MHz No Narrow or Wide band only Peak Band. CE03 test is gone CE07 test is gone CS101 replaces CS01 CS02 test is gone CS06 test is gone CS114 Bulk Current Injection is combo replacement of CS02 whole sprectrum &