Re: RTTE Directive

2001-12-14 Thread reheller
Richard, * If the test methods you are using are harmonized to the RTTE Directive then you do not need a Notified Body. * If the frequency you are using is harmonized by all EU countries then you do not need the "Alert "symbol (exclamation point in a circle). 1. Harmonized test methods and fre

Re: RTTE Directive

2001-08-06 Thread Allan G. Carr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Courtland The R&TTE Directive 1999/05/EEC states:- Article 2 - Definitions For the purpose of this Directive the following definitions shall apply: (b) "telecommunications terminal equipment" means a product enabling communication or a relevant c

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-06-22 Thread CE-test - Ing. Gert Gremmen - ce-marking and more...
ssage- >>From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >>[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of >>wo...@sensormatic.com >>Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:48 PM >>To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >>Subject: RE: RTTE Directive >> >> >> >

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-06-22 Thread WOODS
It can be confusing. Let's see if I can help. I will address the Directive from the point of view of transmitters. The essential requirements relate to three areas: safety, EMC and the radio spectrum. For safety and EMC, you have a choice - continue to follow the procedures in the LV and EMC Dir

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-06-21 Thread Barbara Judge
Courtland, For equipment covered by harmonized standards you are correct, no Notified or Conformity Assessment Body involvement is needed. This is the situation that most terminal equipment manufacturers find themselves in currently. On the other hand, there are a number of RF standards that ha

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-03-16 Thread Wagner, John P (John)
538-4241 johnwag...@avaya.com > -- > From: Allan, James[SMTP:james_al...@milgo.com] > Reply To: Allan, James > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 6:27 AM > To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Subject: RE: RTTE Directive > > > Amund has opened

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-03-16 Thread Allan, James
: Thursday, March 15, 2001 4:16 PM > To: ctho...@patton.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Subject: Re: RTTE Directive > > > Thomas, > > Check the equipment list on > http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/rtte/listeq.htm > > Amund, Oslo/Norway >

Re: RTTE Directive

2001-03-15 Thread amund
Thomas, Check the equipment list on http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/rtte/listeq.htm Amund, Oslo/Norway On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:52:11 -0500 "Courtland Thomas" wrote: > >Hello Group, > >I would like to know if there is a list of equipment that falls under the >RTTE Directive. My area of co

Re: RTTE Directive

2001-03-02 Thread jerry.rober...@btinternet.com
Amund You could check out the useful links page on the R&TTE Compliance Association web site. . This association is focussed upon understanding and effectively using EU Directives ( particularly 99/5) in a manufacturing, testing and marketing context. Jerry Roberton Secretary R&

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-03-01 Thread Wismer, Sam
Message- From: am...@westin.org [mailto:am...@westin.org] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 4:29 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Cc: wo...@sensormatic.com Subject: RE: RTTE Directive Hi all, Regarding RTTE and the NB role, we have this case: 1. Product: Satellite transmitter/reveicer, KU-band

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-03-01 Thread amund
Hi all, Regarding RTTE and the NB role, we have this case: 1. Product: Satellite transmitter/reveicer, KU-band (10-14GHz) 2. Harmonized standards exist As far as I understand, we do not need a NB for certification. Apply annex III and issue a DoC. If the product shall be put into marked in EU

Re: RTTE Directive

2001-02-28 Thread John Woodgate
<91f59c34502abee3f414a3dbc8e164923a9cf...@lxe.com>, Wismer, Sam inimitably wrote: >No disrespect to the test labs out there because I have gotten a lot of good >information from some, but I encourage folks to get there information from >multiple sources and include the actual regulating agencies.

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-02-28 Thread Wismer, Sam
Thomas; emcpost Subject: RE: RTTE Directive There is some confusion over this subject: 1/ the ce marking directive still requires a rep "on-board" so resident on European soil. All New Approach directives under ce comply to this. 2/ The notified body (NB) is still required for

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-02-28 Thread CE-test - Ing. Gert Gremmen - ce-marking and more...
There is some confusion over this subject: 1/ the ce marking directive still requires a rep "on-board" so resident on European soil. All New Approach directives under ce comply to this. 2/ The notified body (NB) is still required for R&TTE not harmonized standards to prescribe a test su

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-02-27 Thread Wismer, Sam
Courtland, Assuming all of the standards that apply to your equipment are harmonised, you are correct there is no need for a Notified Body. Not a bad idea however to have them do your testing. As far as the authorized representative within the community, I have long believed that this was not ne

RE: RTTE Directive

2001-02-27 Thread WOODS
A representative is necessary if the manufacture is not resident in the EU. That entity keeps the technical file and performs any other duties expressly assigned by the manufacturer. This procedure is not related to any procedural requirements to use or not use a Notified Body. A Notified Body is