In a message dated 9/24/02 9:47:03 AM Central Daylight Time,
jrbar...@iglou.com writes:
> I agree with Warren that electrostatic discharge (ESD) testing is the
> most important single immunity test that you can run during
> development
Here I beg to differ, Fast transient Burst has been the mos
Hi Warren,
My charge includes the test reports... I've made it so the data collection
process writes the report for me. All I have to do is modify a generic
front section. Total time about 3 hours...
I'm sure other labs have done similar processes.
Cheers,
Derek.
Jim, as I see it, EFT and Surge are not a whole lot different except
for the amount of power in the surge pulses. Surge is pretty much a
test of the power supply's ability to handle the power and not pass it
to the secondary circuitry. I believe that a good line filter coupled
with the use
Thanks to all who have responded so far. One note of clarification: we are
already set up for doing ESD testing in-house, and I agree that's where most
of our failures will happen. I also agree that much of the immunity suite
will take care of itself on a well designed unit that has low emission
Surge and EFT test equipment for AC, DC, and signal ports
When you consider the cost of reports I think the cost goes up from
$4500. Two of the labs I use, cost runs about $5000 for the immunity
testing only plus cost of reports, give or take a few nickels.
Warren
On Monday, Sep 23, 2002,
When you consider the cost of reports I think the cost goes up from
$4500. Two of the labs I use, cost runs about $5000 for the immunity
testing only plus cost of reports, give or take a few nickels.
Warren
On Monday, Sep 23, 2002, at 19:30 US/Pacific, lfresea...@aol.com wrote:
In a me
Jim,
I agree with Warren that electrostatic discharge (ESD) testing is the
most important single immunity test that you can run during
development. In my previous job as a product developer at IBM and
Lexmark (mid-1990 to early 2002), I developed/helped develop some 15
generations of network adap
fortjets.com; jim.eich...@xantrex.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Surge and EFT test equipment for AC, DC, and signal ports
In a message dated 9/23/02 9:05:08 PM Central Daylight Time,
war...@comfortjets.com writes:
A suite of testing runs about $6000 for immunity for ITE equipment to
chner
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Surge and EFT test equipment for AC, DC, and signal ports
Jim, it is just my opinion, but well-designed equipment does not have
much risk of failure for the majority of the tests. The one test that
is worth some investment is an ESD test device. I belie
In a message dated 9/23/02 9:05:08 PM Central Daylight Time,
war...@comfortjets.com writes:
> A suite of testing runs about $6000 for immunity for ITE equipment to
> meet EN 55 024 without even talking about the Radiated Immunity
> requirements equipment and a chamber. You are going to likely
Jim, it is just my opinion, but well-designed equipment does not have
much risk of failure for the majority of the tests. The one test that
is worth some investment is an ESD test device. I believe that this is
the most commonly-failed test and often the most difficult to correct
without so
11 matches
Mail list logo
