Ralph McDiarmid wrote (in
) about
'Test Standard', on Tue, 27 Sep 2005:
>That is a very important point and I suspect one which is generally
>understood. In particular, it seems to me that meeting the "safety
>objectives" of the LVD is the key point, not nece
John Woodgate wrote:
"It isn't strictly correct to say that standards are 'under'
Directives, and it can be quite misleading."
That is a very important point and I suspect one which is generally
understood. In particular, it seems to me that meeting the "safety
objectives" of the LVD is the key
rehel...@mmm.com wrote (in
)
about 'Test Standard', on Tue, 27 Sep 2005:
>Can I test a product to standard under a given Directive if the product
>does not fall under that Directive?
Of course you CAN, but whether it's a waste of time or not is another
matter. It isn'
Bob,
You can test any product to any standard. The next question is what
do you want to do with the data? Why would you choose that particular
standard? Finally, why would anyone else accept the data to represent your
product meeting the requirements of the Directive?
These are the m
Can I test a product to standard under a given Directive if the product
does not fall under that Directive?
Bob Heller
3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651- 778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
=
-
2005 IEEE Symposium on Product Safety Engineering
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
Can anyone help?
I was given a requirement t-- "A device must not exhibit disruption when a 1
microfarad capacitor, charged to plus or minus 680 volts DC is discharged
between the hot and neutral AC supply lines, at any phase fr
Dear Jim,
Thanks for taking the time to read the standard. Let me expand on the
justification of the changes.
Table of Content
1) New current target
2) On the correlation problems with ESD testing
3) Specific answers to your points (marked by ### in your email)
David Pommerenk
renke, David"
To: "Jim Ericson" ; "emcpost"
Cc: "Pommerenke, David"
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 6:04 AM
Subject: ESD test standard - present CDV - justification for changes
Dear Jim,
Thanks for taking the time to read the standard. Let me expand on the
justifica
8 matches
Mail list logo
