I read in !emc-pstc that nickjro...@cs.com wrote (in
<16.1c718a0e.29d24...@cs.com>) about 'U.S. Safety Regulations', on Tue,
26 Mar 2002:
>John, I have heard you express these sorts
>of ideas before. Can I ask you if you have
>any authority you can quote t
John, I have heard you express these sorts
of ideas before. Can I ask you if you have
any authority you can quote to back them up?
To the best of my knowledge (and that may not
be all that good) the only law that can be tried in a
UK is UK law (English or Scottish where they
are different) The di
I read in !emc-pstc that Doug McKean wrote (in
<000401c1d4da$9a8f5bd0$cb3e3...@corp.auspex.com>) about 'U.S. Safety
Regulations', on Tue, 26 Mar 2002:
>
>"John Woodgate" wrote:
>>
>> This *might* be significant in the UK, because the parliamentary
"John Woodgate" wrote:
>
> This *might* be significant in the UK, because the parliamentary
> draftsmen who interpret the Directives as Statutory Instruments, under
> the guidance of Ministers, have been accused of 'gold-plating' the
> Directives, i.e. 'stretching' the provisions in the directi
ot;@sweeper.lex.lexmark.com
cc:(bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: Re: U.S. Safety Regulations
George
I fail to follow your argument, The fact that you have
not been challenged or taken to law by any member state
does not mean that it is not the laws of the member states
that have leg
I read in !emc-pstc that Nick Rouse wrote (in
<000f01c1d454$c9b2e390$0c4aacac@nick>) about 'U.S. Safety Regulations',
on Mon, 25 Mar 2002:
>I fail to follow your argument, The fact that you have
>not been challenged or taken to law by any member state
>does not mean t
rs and users operate in the various countries and you should
beware of the subtle differences between them.
Nick Rouse
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Nick Rouse"
Cc: "emc"
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: U.S. Safety Regulations
>
>
>
I read in !emc-pstc that geor...@lexmark.com wrote (in <200203251717.MAA
11...@interlock2.lexmark.com>) about 'U.S. Safety Regulations', on Mon,
25 Mar 2002:
>Since this process was adopted by the EU, we have not
>had a single EU member state ask to see either our DoC
>or
siness in the EU.
George Alspaugh
"Nick Rouse" on 03/22/2002 04:44:05 PM
To: "emc" ,
"George_Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark.LEXMARK"@sweeper.lex.lexmark.com
cc:(bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: Re: U.S. Safety Regulations
Thanks George for you
equipment solt to comsumers.
Nick Rouse
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:57 PM
Subject: U.S. Safety Regulations
>
>
>
> There seems to be some confusion regarding U.S. product safety
> regulations. It is not as complicated as so
There seems to be some confusion regarding U.S. product safety
regulations. It is not as complicated as some have made it
appear. I will try to simplify this topic.
First, the European Directives may be EU law, but they are only
directed to member states, not manufacturers, over which they
ha
11 matches
Mail list logo
