, 2003 4:53 PM
To: Gary McInturff
Cc: john.al...@era.co.uk; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: product safety audit scenario
Hi Gary:
Your comment triggers another comment: Leadership.
Typically, we tend to let the inspector be the
leader for the duration of the inspection.
The host
: product safety audit scenario
Alice,
An inspector cannot hold your shipment! They can however ask you to remove the
agency marking from the products prior to shipment.
Some examples of major deviations:
1) change of power supply
2) pcb traces that are different than original design
3) change
Hi Gary:
Your comment triggers another comment: Leadership.
Typically, we tend to let the inspector be the
leader for the duration of the inspection.
The host can be the leader.
The host can set the agenda (in advance, although
the inspector need not be notified). First, is to
decide
: FastWave [mailto:bi...@fastwave.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:12 PM
To: Sylvia Toma; Lay Siang Saw; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: product safety audit scenario
The Certification laboratories such as UL, CSA, ETL, MET, etc. cannot hold a
shipment. However, they can require
Agree, with it all, except I signed the VN - right after it was cleared
up
with the UL engineer. The inspector was correct that it didn't match the
descriptive file, it was also the case that it didn't matter from a hazard
perspective, and to avoid the problem in the future we did need
, February 18, 2003 1:51 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: product safety audit scenario
Hi all,
Can anyone share with me under what conditions an auditor is allowed
to
stop shipments ?
Thanks,alice
-- Forwarded by Lay Siang Saw/MY/Asia/Celestica on
02/18/2003 06
:16
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: product safety audit scenario
In the real world, however, such jugements are made by the safety agency
factory inspectors. Unfortunately, our factories have received several
variance notices in the past, but not a single one has resulted
...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: product safety audit scenario
When the product differs from your product description - (most) auditors are
expressly forbidden to make engineering judgments - therefore is it says
Painted Steel in the narrative description and its actually Anodized
Aluminum then he will have
Gregg
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Lay Siang Saw
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:51 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: product safety audit scenario
Hi all,
Can anyone share with me under what conditions an auditor
...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc:
Subject:product safety audit scenario
Hi all,
Thank you very much for your comments.I have received many replies from
this forum.
May be someone out there can standardize this,applicable to UL,TUV,CSA
etc.
On the reportOn the physical
Hi Alice:
Scenario : Component A with rating mentioned in the UL's product report as
90-135/180-265 Vac, however in the phyical unit is written as 115/230 V .
Q1 : Is this a non conformity ? Should a VN be raised ?
Yes, this is a non-conformity.
In this case, the report should be
Scenario : Component A with rating mentioned in the UL's product report
as
90-135/180-265 Vac, however in the phyical unit is written as 115/230 V .
Q1 : Is this a non conformity ? Should a VN be raised ?
Theoretically, it's a non-conformity, however if the component is being used
within its
-Concepts.com
www.Edcosurge.com
-Original Message-
From: Lay Siang Saw [ mailto:l...@celestica.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 10:41 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: product safety audit scenario
Hi all,can anyone share with me with your comments
Scenario
13 matches
Mail list logo
