Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] who regulates road trains?

Action Park was called "Traction Park". Don Gies Internal From: Ted Eckert <07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 11:16 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] who regulates road trains? [Ext

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] who regulates road trains?

8, 2022 6:22 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] who regulates road trains? Hi Gary, I can only speak of requirements in the United States. I believe these fall under the requirements for amusement park rides. ASTM F24 has the standards, with subcommittee F24.60 p

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] who regulates road trains?

arily reflect those of my employer. From: Gary Tornquist <05big...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2022 9:53 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PSES] who regulates road trains? Hi All, Kind of off-the wall question, but would you know who regulates road trains?

[PSES] who regulates road trains?

Hi All, Kind of off-the wall question, but would you know who regulates road trains? These are wheeled vehicles with one typically battery powered engine in the front pulling several passenger coaches behind. These slow vehicles typically operate in controlled environments such as zoos

Re: [PSES] Fail analysis on a micro switch - who have this service?

First, if you haven't already, consult the manufacturer. Maybe the contact material is not suitable for the voltage or the current in your application. Microswitches now rarely fail due to contamination. Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk

[PSES] Fail analysis on a micro switch - who have this service?

A micro switch occasionally fails because it does not make contact during activation, and this is probably due to the contact surfaces being damaged or dust / debris on them. Any suggestions on labs that may have this competence to do some work and analyze on such an issue? Thanks! Bes

[PSES] Who is this fellow?

I see that a certain Mr. Perkins is now an IEEE Fellow.  Well deserved. -- Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safe

[PSES] repeat of EMC lab test error presentation for those who missed the first time

Hi All, There was a mix up on which month the presentation was, should have been May and I said June. So here is the updated data: EMC test errors Wed, May 27, 2015 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM PDT Please join my meeting

Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)

On 9/2/2014 8:21 PM, Nyffenegger, Dave wrote: So if my employer who is not CA based but does have other direct employees in CA, sends me to CA for a few days to work, they have to take out the CA income tax too? Seems like CA has put up a big closed for business sign. Could be worse

Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)

From: Doug Powell Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:40 AM To: jmsh...@pacbell.net ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't) Just for clarification, may I get concise answers to each of

Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)

AMTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGReply To: John ShinnSubject: Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't) This issue has been in effect since Jan. 1, 2010.  See:  https://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/2013/13_587.pdf or:  https://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms

Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)

7:27 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't) Unless you're in show business. There's no business like show business - it's subsidized by the taxes everyone else pays. Ken Jav

Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)

000 > To: > Conversation: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got > there on business!!! (Don't) > Subject: Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got > there on business!!! (Don't) > > So if my employer who is not CA b

Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)

So if my employer who is not CA based but does have other direct employees in CA, sends me to CA for a few days to work, they have to take out the CA income tax too? Seems like CA has put up a big closed for business sign. -Dave -Original Message- From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja

Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)

Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:37:05 -0700 > To: > Subject: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there > on business!!! (Don't) > > Hi All, > > Just a note to those of you, especially consultants, but potentially > anyone who visits California, eve

[PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)

Hi All, Just a note to those of you, especially consultants, but potentially anyone who visits California, even for a day, on business. CA has new rules that require companies there (they don't all know about it yet but will be in trouble after the first of the year if they don&#

[PSES] List of Manufacturers who have submitted Notification?

  Do any of the European spectrum authorities/administrations have online lists of manufacturers who have submitted One Stop Notification for non-harmonized radios?   Many thanks! - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety

IEEE SCV PSES meeting on Tuesday, January 26, 2010 : Codes, Standards and Certifications - Who requires what, and why

Forwarded... From: Shirley Tarantino Intertek [mailto:shirley.tarant...@intertek.com] Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:58 PM To: Shirley Tarantino Intertek Subject: IEEE PSES meeting on Tuesday, January 26, 2010 : Codes, Standards and Listings - Who requires what, and why Dear Colleagues and

Thanks to all who replied

I want to thank everyone who took the time to reply to my query about a 75Ghz testing lab. I have received so many replies I can't possibly reply to each one individually. So - - A huge thank you to all who replied. I really appreciate your willingness to assist a fellow worker bee i

RE: Who is responsible for the penalty?

Nick & Lauren, Many thanks for your useful comments. Regards. Scott From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of lauren_cr...@amat.com Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:46 AM To: 'emc-pstc' Subject: Re: Who is responsible for the penalty?

RE: Who is responsible for the penalty?

, February 10, 2009 3:46 PM To: 'emc-pstc' Subject: Re: Who is responsible for the penalty? Nick's reply stirred up for me some additional comments that may be of value. For all practical purposes a company external to the EU "does not exist" in the eyes of the EU direc

Re: Who is responsible for the penalty?

TX 512 272-6540 [#922 26540] - external use - Save paper and trees! Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Nick Williams Sent by: emc-p...@ieee.org 02/10/2009 02:24 PM To Scott Xe cc "'emc-pstc'" Subject Re:

Re: Who is responsible for the penalty?

At 21:20 +0800 9/2/09, Scott Xe wrote: >Must the one who signed the Doc be working in EU countries? No. >Has the one >received any legal authority from the company? They assume such authority by signing the Declaration. A company would be silly to permit this to be done by someone who

Who is responsible for the penalty?

Must the one who signed the Doc be working in EU countries? Has the one received any legal authority from the company? Looking at the penalty clause of REACH compliance, on conviction on indictment, to a fine or to imprisonment not exceeding two years, or both. Is the penalty applied to the

boy who suffered a 25,000-volt electric shock... and lived

An interesting tale. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=564383&in_page_id=1770 Regards, Peter L. Tarver, PE ptar...@ieee.org CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail message and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and

RE: Thanks to all who replied

:34 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Thanks to all who replied Thanks to all who took the time to reply to my request for information on the Energy Independence and Security Act - 2007. I very much appreciate all the replies. Now the fun starts - reviewing the compliance on all the external

RE: Thanks to all who replied

at snow-capped peaks) From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Taylor, Michael Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 6:34 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Thanks to all who replied Thanks to all who took the time to reply to my request for information on the Energy Independence and

Thanks to all who replied

Thanks to all who took the time to reply to my request for information on the Energy Independence and Security Act - 2007. I very much appreciate all the replies. Now the fun starts - reviewing the compliance on all the external supplies we use with the many products we produce. We don&#

Thanks to all who responded

Thanks to all who responded to my enquiry on "energy efficiency of external power supplies". I appreciate all the responses and want to say THANK YOU to all who took the time to respond. Regards to all. Michael Taylor-NCE Ha

Re: Who should sign DoCs

emcp...@aol.com wrote (in <129.62a8be55.302a6...@aol.com>) about 'Who should sign DoCs', on Tue, 9 Aug 2005: >I'm wondering who should sign the CE and C-Tick DoC.  Does it have to >be someone in upper management?  Is there any written requirement? >  Ther

Who should sign DoCs

Hello, I'm wondering who should sign the CE and C-Tick DoC. Does it have to be someone in upper management? Is there any written requirement? Thanks, Tim Pierce This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering So

RE: Who is responsible for the conducted noise injected into A.C mains

>-Original Message- >From: Tom Cokenias [mailto:t...@tncokenias.org] >Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 9:19 PM >To: kbalasubraman...@scmmicro.co.in; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >Cc: T.Sato; gdstuyvenb...@yahoo.com; owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; >ri...@sdd.hp.com &g

RE: Who is responsible for the conducted noise injected into A.C mains

...@yahoo.com; owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; ri...@sdd.hp.com Subject: Who is responsible for the conducted noise injected into A.C mains Dear Experts, Our device which is an unintentional radiator is to be installed near to an intentionally radiating device. That intentional radiator operates

Re: Who is responsible for the conducted noise injected into A.C mains

It would depend a lot on how the product marketed. Are the two devices sold separately or together? Are they integrated into a single system? If so who is the integrator? It appears that both products would fall under FCC Part 15 in the US. If the two are sold separately in the US, there is

Re: Who is responsible for the conducted noise injected into A.C mains

: kbalasubraman...@scmmicro.co.in List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:46:21 +0530 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Cc: "T.Sato" , gdstuyvenb...@yahoo.com, owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org, ri...@sdd.hp.com Subject: Who is responsible for the conducted noise injected into

Who is responsible for the conducted noise injected into A.C mains

. Who is responsibled for this and who should make the preventive measures to overcome this issue? Control panel manufacturer ? The intentional radiator device installer? or we? Sincerely K.Balasubramanian

Re: SV: Who is responsible?

I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in ) about 'SV: Who is responsible?' on Sun, 30 Nov 2003: >Thanks to all of you. > >> I'm a bit surprised to see this question raised in 2003. It was very >> commonly asked several years ago. > >New f

SV: Who is responsible?

ning out of memory :-) . Amund > -Opprinnelig melding- > Fra: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]På vegne av John Woodgate > Sendt: 27. november 2003 23:39 > Til: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Emne: Re: SV: Who is respon

Re: SV: Who is responsible?

I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in ) about 'SV: Who is responsible?' on Thu, 27 Nov 2003: >It us assume that >X = Computer - made by Manufacturer A >Y = Monitor - made by Manufacturer A >Z = Monitor - made by Manufacturer B > >Usually, manu

SV: Who is responsible?

12:23 > Til: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Emne: Re: Who is responsible? > > > > I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in mhpeibnilgeomcpaa.am...@westin-emission.no>) about 'Who is responsible?' > on Wed, 26 Nov 2003: > >According to the

Re: Who is responsible?

I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in ) about 'Who is responsible?' on Wed, 26 Nov 2003: >According to the EU law (i.e. RTTE directive), will Manufacturer A be >responsible for unit Z if it fails? Yes. Of course, A may well decide to take civil action

Re: Who is responsible?

LSO possible that manufacturer A's system is only compliant with item Y. I've seen that happen with peripherals a manufacturer depends on to filter noise his equipment inserts on I/O cables. Who is the goat THEN, eh? Test what you sell; you are blamed if anything goes wrong, so it makes sense. Some

Who is responsible?

Manufacturer A produce a system that consists of the units X and Y. The units are CE marked based on testing. Manufacturer B produce a units Z. The unit is CE marked based on testing. Manufacturer A will remove his own unit Y and replace it with unit Z from manufacturer B. Manufacturer A will put

Re: Who sign the DoC?

Hello Gang, The situation with the Medical Devices Directive is very clear. The manufacturer is NOT the organization that builds something, it is the organization whose name is on the device. Hence an organization, as in the previous example -- Boots, whose name is on the device, is the organiz

Re: Who sign the DoC?

I read in !emc-pstc that richhug...@aol.com wrote (in <6e.30b7be44.2c64c e...@aol.com>) about 'Who sign the DoC?' on Fri, 8 Aug 2003: >You said: For the EMC Directive (and the LVD), there IS a clear >answer. The manufacturer must sign, irrespective of where

Re: Who sign the DoC?

thorised manufacturer and the non-EU manufacturer). Example 2: Some retailers (Boots the Chemist in the UK is one such example) sell electrical products under their own brand name, even though the items themselves are produced by another company, which may be outside the EU. In this situation it i

Re: Who sign the DoC?

I read in !emc-pstc that charles.mar...@ps.ge.com wrote (in <6BBE5C5603D 0d611a06f0002a5d65564021ff...@nyschx22psge.sch.ge.com>) about 'Who sign the DoC?' on Thu, 7 Aug 2003: >I have a question without a clear answer. If a manufacturer is outside >the >EU, who is requir

Re: Who sign the DoC?

directive you say you comply with. Considering the creation of a DoC to satisfy the requirements of a Directive, then different directives have different attestation procedures that define who must produce the DoC, where the DoC and Technical File must be held (whether in the Community or not) etc

Re: Who sign the DoC?

In a message dated 8/7/2003 1:02:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time, charles.mar...@ps.ge.com writes: > Does that person have to be in the EU? For the LVD and EMC Directives, the clear answer is *no*. Greg Galluccio Global Advantage International www.globaladvantage.ca This message is from the IEEE

Who sign the DoC?

Hi Group, I have a question without a clear answer. If a manufacturer is outside the EU, who is required to sign the DoC? Does that person have to be in the EU? Thank you in advance, Charlie Martin This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc

Thanks to all who responded

on the EMC show hotel Q. This is quite a problem.. Best Regards Charles Grasso Senior Compliance Engineer Echostar Communications Corp. Tel: 303-706-5467 Fax: 303-799-6222 Cell: 303-204-2974 Email: charles.gra...@echostar.com; Email Alternate: chasgra...

Re: Who decides to sign a D of C

I read in !emc-pstc that Andrew Wood wrote (in ) about 'Who decides to sign a D of C', on Fri, 12 Apr 2002: I declined to respond to this article, but as a result of an e-mail exchange with Andrew, I will now do so. >The advice about personal liability was given to me by a

Re: [Fwd: Who or what is W letter in a circle]

To All, Thanks to all who replied. the switch supplier's compliance guy informed me that the w in a circle is his factory designation. Thanks Paul J Smith, Teradyne. --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Comm

Re: [Fwd: Who or what is W letter in a circle]

It would help if you said what the item was that had the symbol. The german company Wickmann also has a symbol consisting of the letter W in a circle. They make fuses, fuseholders, and other circuit protection devices. > Subject: Who or what is W letter in a circle > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2

Re: [Fwd: Who or what is W letter in a circle]

gt; Original Message ---- > Subject: Who or what is W letter in a circle > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:33:29 -0500 > From: paul_j_sm...@teradyne.com > To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > > Folks, > > Is anyone familiar with Who or what is W symbol in a circle? > Your

[Fwd: Who or what is W letter in a circle]

Forwarded for Paul Smith. Please CC:paul_j_sm...@teradyne.com on any relpies. Dave Heald EMC-PSTC Admin Original Message Subject: Who or what is W letter in a circle List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:33:29 -0500 From: paul_j_sm...@teradyne.com To

FW: New WHO Fact Sheet: ELF and Cancer

FYI: here is the latest official WHO position -- Forwarded Message > From: bullo...@who.ch > Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:54:12 +0200 > > Subject: New WHO Fact Sheet: ELF and Cancer > > Please find attached a copy of the recently published WHO Fact Sheet: > "ELECTRO

Looking for companies who can assess conformance to NFPA 86C

Dear Colleagues I work with a company that manufacturers "vertical furnaces" using resistive heating elements for use in the semiconductor manufacturing industry. I am looking for a company that is accredited to do inspections of equipment conformance to NFPA 86C. Please email me your suggest

RE: Who mentioned FIREARMS!!!!!

ilto:pgodf...@icomply.com] > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 11:55 AM > To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Subject: Who mentioned FIREARMS! > > > > Ok guys, I have certainly enjoyed reading the responses to my > question 'so > far'. > > I must be honest an

Who mentioned FIREARMS!!!!!

Ok guys, I have certainly enjoyed reading the responses to my question 'so far'. I must be honest and say that I was forewarned about mentioning/using the word firearm (Scott, thanks - you know me. Learn the hard way). I'd like to thank all those who have given this some thou

RE: Guam..Thanks again to all who responded - n/t

FW: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?

Posted for: Chris Duprés [chris_dup...@compuserve.com] > -Original Message- > From: Chris Duprés [SMTP:chris_dup...@compuserve.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 1999 12:21 AM > To: Price, Ed > Subject: FW: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs? > >

Re: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?

: 'Allan G. Carr' Cc: 'Price, Ed' ; Sent: Thursday, November 25, 1999 6:05 AM Subject: RE: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs? > > Alan, > > As far as the quotation is concerned, I would refer you to the words in Reg. > 40(2)(c), Erg 57(2)(c), Erg 70(2)(c) for clauses detail

RE: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?

Alan, As far as the quotation is concerned, I would refer you to the words in Reg. 40(2)(c), Erg 57(2)(c), Erg 70(2)(c) for clauses detailing who signs the DoC. Under the UK regulations it will, as I said in my email, "be signed by or on behalf of the manufacturer or his autho

Re: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?

and identify that signatory". Sorry to be pedantic but the UK Statutory Instrument 1992 No.2372 does not contain the above quote. This quote is from EC EMC Guidelines which therefore clarify the issue. >The question always arises as to who ends up in court. As an example, if >the DoC

RE: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?

where that person is not the manufacturer, of the manufacturer. For those who read this stuff and are not used to the arcane legal words inside UK Statutory Instruments this is often difficult to understand. The problem is no one else in the EU gives guidance to the manufacturers who are try

FW: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?

Posted for: al...@acarr.demon.co.uk > -Original Message- > From: Allan G. Carr [SMTP:al...@acarr.demon.co.uk] > Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 7:14 AM > To: emc-p...@ieee.org > Subject: Re: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs? > > Chris > > I

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

I agree this is a good question, and have been following this with interest to see what crops up. One point worth making is that the DoC signatory is legally responsible under criminal law. Signing a DoC fraudulently claiming compliance is a criminal offence and such criminal liability cannot be

Re: D of C - Who Signs?

I always thought that the signatory of these type of documents was signing as a representative of the corporation. I think some documents require that an "officer of the company" sign for this reason. They are assumed to be authorized to represent the corporation. --

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

pany and to the world about it) you can bet that the company would come looking to have that signer share some of the responsibility for past harm and remedial costs. If the product really is unsafe, who is in the best position to change the design and effect a recall? The company is - n

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

ot then guarantee the continued compliance of the product! "Think about it" if you don't have the control procedures - or even if you do but don't enforce them properly!! Regards John Allen Racal -- From: Scott Douglas[SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com] Sent: 11 November 19

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

er 1999 16:16 To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: D of C - Who Signs? Hello! Forgive me for asking a possibly dumb question but here goes: If the EU Declaration of Conformity is signed by a responsible/technically competent person who has been nominated on beh

Copy of: D of C - Who Signs?

-- Forwarded Message -- From: Chris Duprés, 100014,3703 TO: "Tony Reynolds", INTERNET:reyno...@pb.com DATE: 11/11/99 20:31 RE: Copy of: D of C - Who Signs? Hi Tony. You asked... < In other words is it acceptable to issue D of C's to supplie

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

All, If a regulation changes during the life of the product, a re-test and change to the DoC might well be in order, regardless of who signed the original, or when. As an example - EN 50082-1:1992 is the old generic immunity standard for everything except heavy industrial equipment under the

Re: D of C - Who Signs?

Manager > Racal Defence Electronics Ltd > Bracknell > UK > > -- > From: Scott Douglas[SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com] > Sent: 11 November 1999 13:39 > To: reyno...@pb.com; emc-p...@ieee.org > Subject:RE: D of C - Who Signs? > > The DoC must be re-sig

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

updated and the optional period has gone by, then you have to update both the product and the DofC regardless of who the signatory is. As for not being envisioned by the creators of the directives and standards, that is not unusual nor unacceptable. There are oft many cases where unintended c

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

- Dallas > -Original Message- > From: John Allen [SMTP:john.al...@rdel.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 10:55 AM > To: emc-p...@ieee.org > Subject: RE: D of C - Who Signs? > > > Hi Folks > > I disagree strongly with Scott's assessment that

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

crm.com] Sent: 11 November 1999 13:39 To: reyno...@pb.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject:RE: D of C - Who Signs? The DoC must be re-signed. Scott s_doug...@ecrm.com ECRM Incorporated Tewksbury, MA USA -Original Message- From: reyno...@pb.com [mailto:reyno...@pb.com] Sent:

Re: D of C - Who Signs?

k the contract simply by firing the person who signed it. Right? It is the same concept. Brian Kunde - Original Message - From: Tony Reynolds To: Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 10:15 AM Subject: D of C - Who Signs? Hello! Forgive me for asking a possibly dumb questio

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

The DoC must be re-signed. Scott s_doug...@ecrm.com ECRM Incorporated Tewksbury, MA USA -Original Message- From: reyno...@pb.com [mailto:reyno...@pb.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 10:16 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: D of C - Who Signs? Importance: Low Hello

D of C - Who Signs?

Hello! Forgive me for asking a possibly dumb question but here goes: If the EU Declaration of Conformity is signed by a responsible/technically competent person who has been nominated on behalf of the company's Directors and then that person leave

RE: Re: HAR Cordage - Who needs it?

Hello John, I really doubt if you will hear a complaint from a Customer about the approvals on a jumper cord. When you get down to it, the only people who care about approvals are regulators, test houses, and certification engineers. Since Feller is located in Austria, HAR cordage is no

Re: HAR Cordage - Who needs it?

Ron, As a product developer, my major concern was getting the Lexmark Marknet XLe approved worldwide. From my viewpoint HAR approval of the jumper cord was equivalent to a bunch of individual country approvals. But Feller is still the only manufacturer that I know of that makes IEC-320 jumper co

HAR Cordage - Who needs it?

I'm going to throw a monkey wrench into this discussion. Why do you need HAR cordage? It is not mandatory to use it in Europe or the EU. Also HAR cordage can only be manufactured by suppliers in those countries that have accepted the HAR agreement and use HD 21 or HD 22 as their National Standar

Apology for Who's who

ail? Are you asking for information about myself for a listing? Al Patrick EMC Lab Engineering Manager Scientific-Atlanta 770 903 5148 al.patr...@sciatl.com __ Reply Separator _____ Subject: W

Who has 10m CISPR 22 Semi-Anechoic Chambers

Hello All, I am trying to compile a list of companies and locations that have 10m Semi-Anechoic Chambers. Does anyone know of a list that may exist or just please send me a note if you have one? Thanks, Keith Hardin Lexmark International Inc. email: khar...@lexmark.com

Re[2]: Who

_ Subject: Re: Who Author: ben_perrea...@ub.com at mime List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date:1/30/98 5:59 AM To all the people trying the "who" I'm pretty sure you have to address the message to the address majord...@world.std.com not emc-p...@majordom

RE: Who

I recently confirmed that the correct addressing is: To: majord...@majordomo.ieee.org Message: who emc-pstc James Goedderz Sensormatic > -- > From: ben_perrea...@ub.com[SMTP:ben_perrea...@ub.com] > Reply To: ben_perrea...@ub.com > Sent: Friday, January 3

The "Who" command

Ladies and Gentlemen, As noted in the EMC-PSTC welcome message you receive when joining this forum, the following steps can be taken to view the distribution list: Address:majord...@mail.ieee.org In the body of the message: who emc-pstc (subject line

FW: Who

Ladies and Gentlemen, As noted in the EMC-PSTC welcome message you receive when joining this forum, the following steps can be taken to view the distribution list: Address:majord...@mail.ieee.org In the body of the message: who emc-pstc (subject line is not read

Re: Who

To all the people trying the "who" I'm pretty sure you have to address the message to the address majord...@world.std.com not emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org or t...@majordomo.ieee.org Ben Perreault EMC Engineer Newbridge Networks = chasgra...@aol.com

Who

who emc-pstc

who

> who emc-pstc >

who emc-pstc

who emc-pstc

who emc-pstc

who emc-pstc

who emc-pstc

who emc-pstc Herman Held, PresidentPhone +1-508-667-7000 Quest Engineering Solutions, Inc. FAX +1-508-667-3388 7 Sterling Rd. PO Box 125

Who

who emc-pstc

Re: Who is Yarsly Internatio

RE>Who is Yarsly International? 18/12/97 Heber, SGS Yarsley are a Competent body for the EMC Directive. A notified body under the LVD. Your best point of contact is:- SGS UK +44(0)191-377-2000 In Durham, England. Contact John Whaley

Re: Who is Yarsly Internatio

RE>Who is Yarsly International? 18/12/97 Heber, SGS Yarsley are a Competent body for the EMC Directive. A notified body under the LVD. Your best point of contact is:- SGS UK +44(0)191-377-2000 In Durham, England. Contact John Whaley

Who is Yarsly International?

I've run onto a Notified Body I don't recognize, Yarsley International Certification Services Ltd. NB #0120 - Can someone give me contact information? - Are they a major test house? - Does anyone have experience working with them?

  1   2   >