Note that when I did the wget of the install script, I got the Hardy
version, as there didn't appear to be a Karmic version.
wget http://www.linuxcnc.org/hardy/emc2-install.sh
Was this the correct thing to do?
--
I just quickly looked (I run Debian Lenny here)
There seems to be a change in the way the python packages go together
On the ubuntu site for this package
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/python2.5 :
“python2.5” source package in Karmic
it says (at the bottom of the page):
Build
Lawrence,
thanks for a nice tool in CGCC
i ran the example and found
i needed to create a directory ~/GCode2 and then needed to put the
CGCC directory in there
under my Ubuntu, the cgcc.err file wasn't able to be rm'd but that may
be local permissions on my system
I understand your code better
Oh boy am I truly glad I am not a statistic!
So the solution to the statistical dilemma is to put a mark on the
shaft and bearing housing.
Since we know how many mm the table moves per steppermotorrevolution
we travel a multiple of that distance
And the stepper shaft will be in exactly the same
From: BillRebey b...@rebey.com
Note that when I did the wget of the install script, I got the Hardy
version, as there didn't appear to be a Karmic version.
wget http://www.linuxcnc.org/hardy/emc2-install.sh
Was this the correct thing to do?
Either use precompiled packages on Hardy (they
Dave pravi:
In my experience with steppers that are running on the edge
(mechanically or electrically), they almost never lose steps the same
amount in both directions.
Best thing I can think of doing is to put a 1 dial indicator on the
questionable axis, write a test program or better
Jan de Kruyf pravi:
Oh boy am I truly glad I am not a statistic!
So the solution to the statistical dilemma is to put a mark on the
shaft and bearing housing.
Since we know how many mm the table moves per steppermotorrevolution
we travel a multiple of that distance
And the stepper shaft
I just wonder why every time I post something here got feedback (that's
not good, just use this and .., you don't need that.. etc etc...) and
near none gave solution?
You asked for a way to test your axis, and got 3 solutions:
* use a dial indicator
* use the home switch for probing
* mark the
Alex Joni pravi:
I just wonder why every time I post something here got feedback (that's
not good, just use this and .., you don't need that.. etc etc...) and
near none gave solution?
You asked for a way to test your axis, and got 3 solutions:
Maybe that is the problem. I didn't
Glad the tool might be of use to you!
There was indeed a problem with the postfix -- operator. I made the fix and
v1.01 is available for download at
http://tsemsb.blogspot.com/2010/04/cgcc-now-at-version-101.html
As of now the assignment operators like -= or += are not implemented,
however the
Slavko,
1. I understand you have a desperate need, but at the same time you
cannot hope to solve the issue with software that is still pre-alpha
stage, unless the developer of that software is willing to assist you
heavily.
2. These problems (over 30 years of working with CNC, I might say)
have
On 04/07/2010 04:42 PM, Slavko Kocjancic wrote:
2010/4/7 Alex Jonialex.j...@robcon.ro
I would connect the home input to the probe input.
Home first, then do some moves, then do a probe towards zero, and look at
the point where the probe (home switch ) tripped.
Note: you might have to have
That's where mag mounts come in real handy. I have a 2 depth gauge
that I used on my machine. Mis-calculated the first run. Good thing it
was magnetically attached rather than clamped on...
Mark
On 04/07/2010 08:33 PM, Dave wrote:
In my experience with steppers that are running on the edge
You asked for a way to test your axis, and got 3 solutions:
Maybe that is the problem. I didn't ask for solution. (My english is not
so good so maybe I ask by mystake.)
Ok, I didn't understand that like that.
I propose solution. The software solution to just show message with home
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Alex Joni alex.j...@robcon.ro wrote:
You asked for a way to test your axis, and got 3 solutions:
Maybe that is the problem. I didn't ask for solution. (My english is not
so good so maybe I ask by mystake.)
Ok, I didn't understand that like that.
I
On 4/8/2010 2:08 AM, BillRebey wrote:
Note that when I did the wget of the install script, I got the Hardy
version, as there didn't appear to be a Karmic version.
wget http://www.linuxcnc.org/hardy/emc2-install.sh
Was this the correct thing to do?
On 4/8/2010 7:06 AM, Bernhard Kubicek wrote:
First of all, I am currently 100% ok with the way emc development is
handled.
For the filtering, there are two things:
)First, the patches in axis.
I proposed this filtering menu. The idea is to have external programs, aka
filters, that expect a
17 matches
Mail list logo
