> Yes. I tried to get EMC2 to include rotary axes in the velocity
> calculation, but was overruled.
> So, you have to use inverse time mode, G93, to specify the time the move
> is to take.
> The deal is if you are going to include the rotary axis in the feed
> velocity, the radius needs to
> be ta
If you're set on ethercat, you may want to look at an ethercat module
like...
Hilscher COMX-CA-RE
http://www.hilscher.com/products_details_hardware.html?p_id=P_4579e8138180c&;
bs=15
Beckoff fb11xx http://www.beckhoff.de/english.asp?ethercat/et1100_et1200.htm
They are drop in modules available wi
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Jon Elson wrote:
> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:07:40 -0600
> From: Jon Elson
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Ethernet with EMC2
>
> Viesturs La-cis wrote:
>>
>> I am convinced that many
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> Igor Chudov wrote:
> > So I have this rotary table for 4th axis.
> >
> > If I specify a rotational move in conjunction with a move in coordinae
> axes,
> > like this
> >
> > G1 X1 A25 f1
> >
> > then the rotary move is timed to coincide with the
https://www.osadl.org/Abstract-3-POWERLINK-and-Real-time-Linu.rtlws11-abstra
ct3.0.html?&no_cache=1
> -Original Message-
> From: John L. Craddock [mailto:john.cradd...@xitech.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 6:31 AM
> To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
> Subject: Re: [E
Viesturs La-cis wrote:
>
> I am convinced that many of EMC users have hardware that cannot be
> considered as opensource. Including my ServoStar 601 servo amps.
> My personal feeling (not supported with any facts, numbers or other
> data) is that also Mesa or Pico Systems products contain some
> pr
Igor Chudov wrote:
> So I have this rotary table for 4th axis.
>
> If I specify a rotational move in conjunction with a move in coordinae axes,
> like this
>
> G1 X1 A25 f1
>
> then the rotary move is timed to coincide with the dimensional move.
>
> But f I specify
>
> G1 A360 F1, the speed is igno
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:15:22AM -0600, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> g43 H(tlo)
> g90g00z0w0
> the machine will alarm because the spindle will try to
> raise by the tlo amount
This is the part that most directly causes the pain, I think. The
(pai
Gentlemen,
I have a request for consideration
When setting the Z offset (ie g55...) it is sometimes confusing to the
operator how to implement the tlo into the value written into the var file.
start machine
home machine
make sure z and w values are zero
mdi g43 H(ToolOffsetNumber) to p
Guys, I have an egg on my face. I did no work right when I was just staring
out with 4th axis. I would specify speed and it would no work, it would go a
full speed. This is no longer he case. It works great right now. Possibly it
is so, because I am using more recent software, since I switched back
On 2/9/2011 6:30 AM, John L. Craddock wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Viesturs Lacis [mailto:viesturs.la...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 09 February 2011 20:52
>> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Ethernet with EMC2
>>
>> 2011/2/9 Alex Joni:
>>
>>>
On 9 February 2011 15:12, Farzin Kamangar wrote:
> The idea is to use I/O through the parallel port for jog plus and jog minus.
> Thanks
Yes, absolutely.
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/gui_halui.html
But you might want to consider economising on HAL pins and jogging with USB:
http://wiki.linuxcn
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 08:56:13AM +0200, Belli Button wrote:
> I 'configure' the rotary axis for 'linear' axis, still 360degrees per turn.
> This allows a call of A720, two turns (A1080, three turns, etc). Specifying
> it as rotary means it rolls over every 360 degrees,
If you are talking ab
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 12:00:42AM -0600, Igor Chudov wrote:
> So I have this rotary table for 4th axis.
>
> If I specify a rotational move in conjunction with a move in coordinae axes,
> like this
>
> G1 X1 A25 f1
>
> then the rotary move is timed to coincide with the dimensional move.
>
> But
On 9 February 2011 15:03, Igor Chudov wrote:
> However, your message did no answer my question at all. My question was ,
> how o specify rotational speed.
F ought to work in rotary units per minute, Depending on how you have
set up the rotary that could be degrees per minute, rpm or possibly
radi
Hello EMC users,
I was wondering if I could use HAL for jog plus and jog minus for any
axis. This is like using the + and - buttons for the selected axis in the
manual page.
The idea is to use I/O through the parallel port for jog plus and jog minus.
Thanks
Farzin
--
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Belli Button wrote:
> I 'configure' the rotary axis for 'linear' axis, still 360degrees per turn.
> This allows a call of A720, two turns (A1080, three turns, etc).
> Specifying
> it as rotary means it rolls over every 360 degrees, when you have done a
> few
> tu
> -Original Message-
> From: Viesturs Lacis [mailto:viesturs.la...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 09 February 2011 20:52
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Ethernet with EMC2
>
> 2011/2/9 Alex Joni :
> >> Guys,
> >>
> >> what do You think about these two?
> >> http://w
2011/2/9 Alex Joni :
>> Guys,
>>
>> what do You think about these two?
>> http://www.enclustra.com/en/products/fpga-modules/mars-starter/
>> http://www.enclustra.com/en/products/fpga-modules/mars-mx1/
>>
>
> They are not that expensive by themselves, but I think they _DO NOT_ contain
> the EtherCAT
> Guys,
>
> what do You think about these two?
> http://www.enclustra.com/en/products/fpga-modules/mars-starter/
> http://www.enclustra.com/en/products/fpga-modules/mars-mx1/
>
They are not that expensive by themselves, but I think they _DO NOT_ contain
the EtherCAT slave IPs.
So you have to buy
On 02/08/2011 05:35 PM, Yi-Shin Li wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Viesturs Lāciswrote:
>
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> what do You think about these two?
>> http://www.enclustra.com/en/products/fpga-modules/mars-starter/
>> http://www.enclustra.com/en/products/fpga-modules/mars-mx1/
>>
>> They are
2011/2/9 John L. Craddock :
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jon Elson [mailto:el...@pico-systems.com]
>> Sent: 09 February 2011 13:09
>> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Ethernet with EMC2
>>
>> Viesturs La-cis wrote:
>> > Guys,
>> >
>> > what do You think
22 matches
Mail list logo
