Looks like Andy's boat made in to Oakland, CA ok, he was on the
Derry-Londonderry
http://www.clipperroundtheworld.com/
But the lagging boat ran into some hard weather and is disabled at sea!
http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/01/us/pacific-yacht-rescue/index.html
Dave
---
On 3/31/2012 1:43 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Dave wrote:
>
>
>> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:20:19 -0500
>> From: Dave
>> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>>
>> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Trajectory planning and ot
On Sunday, April 01, 2012 11:21:18 AM Dave did opine:
> Looks like Andy's boat made in to Oakland, CA ok, he was on the
> Derry-Londonderry
>
> http://www.clipperroundtheworld.com/
Good.
> But the lagging boat ran into some hard weather and is disabled at sea!
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2012/
On 3/31/2012 4:45 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> I found this:
> http://www.bitmuster.org/projects/emc.html
>
> the thing that comes to mind, considering the rev date, how it seems
> fairly significant, and recent questions on the list, it's a little
> surprising that this hasn't hit the wiki or been on
Thank you for that link Kirk.
the link looks a bit stale but at the same time it is very much worthwhile
to investigate further.
So I send of an email and downloaded the patches to see what is cooking.
Also I must google the lists a bit because there seems to have been trafic
about it.
By the way
Kent A. Reed wrote:
>
> With a preempt_RT enabled kernel 2.6.33.7.2-rt30 and an appropriately
> modified EMC2.4.4 [patches from Michael Büsch and Jeff Eppler] running
> on an IBM Thinkpad T40 with a 1500MHz PentiumM cpu, the author measured
> the following:
> -
> 1) the EMC2 latency-test
>
>
On 4/1/2012 2:03 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> Kent A. Reed wrote:
>> With a preempt_RT enabled kernel 2.6.33.7.2-rt30 and an appropriately
>> modified EMC2.4.4 [patches from Michael Büsch and Jeff Eppler] running
>> on an IBM Thinkpad T40 with a 1500MHz PentiumM cpu, the author measured
>> the following:
LinuxCNC 2.5.0 is released!
You will not get an automatic update from EMC 2.4 to LinuxCNC 2.5.
To update your Lucid or Hardy machine to 2.5, you need to take a few
steps, documented here:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpdatingTo2.5
Be sure to check the "Changes to your configurat
great to hear! Can someone do a video of the Touchy interface with all the new
features please?
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Chris Radek
Date: Sunday, April 1, 2012 12:09 pm
Subject: [Emc-users] RELEASED: LinuxCNC 2.5.0
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> LinuxCNC 2.5.0 is rele
As ever, a sincere tip-of-the-hat to you, Chris, Seb, and everyone.
Regards,
Kent
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
__
I agree. Thanks for the effort!
Dave
On 4/1/2012 3:41 PM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> As ever, a sincere tip-of-the-hat to you, Chris, Seb, and everyone.
>
> Regards,
> Kent
>
>
> --
> This SF email is sponsosred by:
> Try Wi
MANY THANKS to all those that worked on this.
I looked over the changes and saw several that may change things I've
been grumpy about.
Dave
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:08:35 -0500
Chris Radek wrote:
>
> LinuxCNC 2.5.0 is released!
>
> You will not get an automatic update from EMC 2.4 to Linux
Kent A. Reed wrote:
>
> As an aside, it was interesting to me that while the author of the
> bitmuster article made note of the fact that different tools reported
> different numbers, he/she seemed indifferent to the actual numbers reported.
>
>
Uhhh, why bother making a measurement if you hav
On 04/01/2012 02:08 PM, Chris Radek wrote:
> LinuxCNC 2.5.0 is released!
>
> You will not get an automatic update from EMC 2.4 to LinuxCNC 2.5.
> To update your Lucid or Hardy machine to 2.5, you need to take a few
> steps, documented here:
>
> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpdatingTo2.5
Chris Radek wrote:
> LinuxCNC 2.5.0 is released!
>
Thanks so much for this effort! If you could add a note in the release
notes
about PPMC, that velocity estimation on the UPC board is added, I'd
appreciate it.
The instructions for the update is great, average users should be able
to foll
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> Kent A. Reed wrote:
>>
>> As an aside, it was interesting to me that while the author of the
>> bitmuster article made note of the fact that different tools reported
>> different numbers, he/she seemed indifferent to the actual numbers reported.
>
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 06:25:07PM -0500, Mark Cason wrote:
>
>is the sim version going to be available soon?
There are 2.5.0 packages for 6 sim platforms and 3 realtime:
lucid/linuxcnc2.5-sim/binary-amd64
lucid/linuxcnc2.5-sim/binary-i386
lucid/linuxcnc2.5/binary-i386
hardy/linuxcnc2.5-si
17 matches
Mail list logo